Lecture III: Ideology, Fantasy, Myth: Inspiration and Cognitive Bias in Hierarchical and Egalitarian Ideologies

Inegalitarian ideologies that underwrite social hierarchy persuade subordinates to acquiesce to a domination contract by preying on their cognitive and emotional biases and vulnerabilities. Biases in fear, sympathy, and shame drive people’s acquiescence to subordinate status. Populist authoritarian movements appeal to individuals’ desires for esteem through fantasies of group-based superiority, whereby members bask in the glory of their group without much personal effort. They also purport to compensate individuals subordinated through one social identity by exalting them along an intersecting identity. Such promises are fraudulent and based on false zero-sum thinking. Egalitarian social movements can undercut populist narratives by exposing the ways virtually everyone loses under populist domination contracts, and by offering inspiring depictions of how everyone can win esteem by basking in the glory of the collective achievement of an egalitarian social contract in which we promote everyone’s flourishing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20251221/23
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lecture III: Ideology, Fantasy, Myth: Inspiration and Cognitive Bias in Hierarchical and Egalitarian Ideologies

Elizabeth Anderson
1 links
The Journal of Philosophy
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Lecture III: Ideology, Fantasy, Myth: Inspiration and Cognitive Bias in Hierarchical and Egalitarian Ideologies

Elizabeth Anderson
article en

Abstract

Inegalitarian ideologies that underwrite social hierarchy persuade subordinates to acquiesce to a domination contract by preying on their cognitive and emotional biases and vulnerabilities. Biases in fear, sympathy, and shame drive people’s acquiescence to subordinate status. Populist authoritarian movements appeal to individuals’ desires for esteem through fantasies of group-based superiority, whereby members bask in the glory of their group without much personal effort. They also purport to compensate individuals subordinated through one social identity by exalting them along an intersecting identity. Such promises are fraudulent and based on false zero-sum thinking. Egalitarian social movements can undercut populist narratives by exposing the ways virtually everyone loses under populist domination contracts, and by offering inspiring depictions of how everyone can win esteem by basking in the glory of the collective achievement of an egalitarian social contract in which we promote everyone’s flourishing.

The Journal of PhilosophyVol. 122(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.