The ability to interpret affective states in horses' body language is associated with experience with animals

In light of an increasing interest in the human ability to read equine emotions, Braun and colleagues (2024) recently showed that horse-experienced individuals performed better in interpreting affective states in horses’ body language than horse-inexperienced individuals. Further, individuals with a high emotion recognition ability performed better in interpreting horses’ affective states than individuals with a low emotion recognition ability. The authors operationalized the ability to interpret affective states from horses’ body language by means of the behavior identification test (BIT). In the BIT, participants are presented with 32 photographs of horses that express different affective states and, for each photograph, are asked to choose which out of eight affective states the depicted horse expresses in its body language. In the present study, we scrutinized the replicability and the robustness of these findings. Further, we tested the idea that a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language is associated with experience with animals in general but even more so with horses in particular. We did so by employing the design by Braun and colleagues (2024) in a novel sample, expanded by a number of quasi-experimental variables (i.e., animal/horse contact while growing-up; current pet/horse ownership; contact with animals/horses during work). We directly replicated the effect by Braun and colleagues (2024) that horse-experienced individuals outperform horse-inexperienced individuals in the BIT. Further, we demonstrated that a higher emotion recognition ability was associated with a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language. Further, we found strong evidence in support of the notion that a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language is associated with experience with animals in general and, more strongly, with horses in particular, be it during childhood or currently. We call future research to test the idea that the ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language can be trained through contact with horses or other animals by means of experimental designs to identify a potential causal relation. • Animal-experience associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states • Horse-experience associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states • Emotion recognition associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106716
Primary Topic
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ability to interpret affective states in horses' body language is associated with experience with animals

Moritz Nicolai Braun, Johanna Lass‐Hennemann, Tanja Michael, Alicia Müller-Klein et al.
1 links
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
article

The ability to interpret affective states in horses' body language is associated with experience with animals

Moritz Nicolai Braun, Johanna Lass‐Hennemann, Tanja Michael, Alicia Müller-Klein, Ulrike Link-Dorner, Sina Bülow
article en

Abstract

In light of an increasing interest in the human ability to read equine emotions, Braun and colleagues (2024) recently showed that horse-experienced individuals performed better in interpreting affective states in horses’ body language than horse-inexperienced individuals. Further, individuals with a high emotion recognition ability performed better in interpreting horses’ affective states than individuals with a low emotion recognition ability. The authors operationalized the ability to interpret affective states from horses’ body language by means of the behavior identification test (BIT). In the BIT, participants are presented with 32 photographs of horses that express different affective states and, for each photograph, are asked to choose which out of eight affective states the depicted horse expresses in its body language. In the present study, we scrutinized the replicability and the robustness of these findings. Further, we tested the idea that a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language is associated with experience with animals in general but even more so with horses in particular. We did so by employing the design by Braun and colleagues (2024) in a novel sample, expanded by a number of quasi-experimental variables (i.e., animal/horse contact while growing-up; current pet/horse ownership; contact with animals/horses during work). We directly replicated the effect by Braun and colleagues (2024) that horse-experienced individuals outperform horse-inexperienced individuals in the BIT. Further, we demonstrated that a higher emotion recognition ability was associated with a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language. Further, we found strong evidence in support of the notion that a better ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language is associated with experience with animals in general and, more strongly, with horses in particular, be it during childhood or currently. We call future research to test the idea that the ability to interpret affective states in horses’ body language can be trained through contact with horses or other animals by means of experimental designs to identify a potential causal relation. • Animal-experience associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states • Horse-experience associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states • Emotion recognition associated with better interpretation of horses’ affective states

Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceVol. 290
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Saarland University (DE)
Anova Health Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.