Lecture II: Reconsidering Rousseau's Second Discourse in Light of Contemporary Social Science

Rousseau claimed that esteem competition is the central dynamic driving the creation of social hierarchy. Rousseau’s narrative of our step-by-step descent from perfect equality in the state of nature to a domination contract leading to despotism highlights several necessary conditions for social hierarchy. Contemporary social science supplies surprising evidence for the general structure of Rousseau’s view. We can learn how to stop or reverse the descent into despotism by (re)structuring the economy of esteem in accordance with principles found in relatively egalitarian societies. Yet perverse ideologies activate our cognitive biases and fool us into accepting economies of esteem that lead to hierarchies of unequal standing and power. Ideologies are central sites for the stabilization of both domination contracts and egalitarian social contracts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20251221/22
Primary Topic
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lecture II: Reconsidering Rousseau's Second Discourse in Light of Contemporary Social Science

Elizabeth Anderson
The Journal of Philosophy
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
article

Lecture II: Reconsidering Rousseau's Second Discourse in Light of Contemporary Social Science

Elizabeth Anderson
article en

Abstract

Rousseau claimed that esteem competition is the central dynamic driving the creation of social hierarchy. Rousseau’s narrative of our step-by-step descent from perfect equality in the state of nature to a domination contract leading to despotism highlights several necessary conditions for social hierarchy. Contemporary social science supplies surprising evidence for the general structure of Rousseau’s view. We can learn how to stop or reverse the descent into despotism by (re)structuring the economy of esteem in accordance with principles found in relatively egalitarian societies. Yet perverse ideologies activate our cognitive biases and fool us into accepting economies of esteem that lead to hierarchies of unequal standing and power. Ideologies are central sites for the stabilization of both domination contracts and egalitarian social contracts.

The Journal of PhilosophyVol. 122(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.