Don't Cry for Me Sri Lanka: Beyond Individualisation Towards Responsible Policy Capacity in Public Sector Administration

ABSTRACT This study examines how pervasively corrupt resource‐poor national contexts promote individualisation in public sector leadership (PSL), adversely impacting policy capacity. We argue that the overbearing systemic unethical national contexts can tempt public officials to succumb to unscrupulous practices, undermining strong regulatory mechanisms and policy capacity. Using a triangulated approach that includes in‐depth interviews, secondary data, and ethnographic material, the research presents two case studies in the Sri Lankan national context. We engage a systems perspective of Responsible Leadership to address individualisation in PSL and promote responsibleness in policy capacity. We address a glaring gap in the extant PSL and policy capacity theory by developing a responsible policy capacity framework consisting of the three pillars of responsibleness—ethics, effectiveness and endurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2087
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don't Cry for Me Sri Lanka: Beyond Individualisation Towards Responsible Policy Capacity in Public Sector Administration

Nilupulee Liyanagamage
Public Administration and Development
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Don't Cry for Me Sri Lanka: Beyond Individualisation Towards Responsible Policy Capacity in Public Sector Administration

Nilupulee Liyanagamage
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how pervasively corrupt resource‐poor national contexts promote individualisation in public sector leadership (PSL), adversely impacting policy capacity. We argue that the overbearing systemic unethical national contexts can tempt public officials to succumb to unscrupulous practices, undermining strong regulatory mechanisms and policy capacity. Using a triangulated approach that includes in‐depth interviews, secondary data, and ethnographic material, the research presents two case studies in the Sri Lankan national context. We engage a systems perspective of Responsible Leadership to address individualisation in PSL and promote responsibleness in policy capacity. We address a glaring gap in the extant PSL and policy capacity theory by developing a responsible policy capacity framework consisting of the three pillars of responsibleness—ethics, effectiveness and endurance.

Public Administration and DevelopmentVol. 45(4)
University of Wollongong (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.