Breaking Through: Surveying the Experiences of Social and Behavioral Science Researchers Working in Correctional Environments

Although barriers to conducting correctional research are familiar to those who do this work, there have been no known efforts to document the challenges reported by social and behavioral science researchers across the United States. Quantitative and qualitative analyses from 83 respondents revealed barriers mostly centered on concerns or constraints by a partnering correctional agency; however, few respondents reported issues with the agency’s willingness to collaborate. The extent of barriers was not associated with researchers’ career level, age, years of experience, or employment setting. Despite challenges, participants were primarily motivated to do this work by their interests in addressing social justice issues. Researchers’ strategies for conducting research in correctional settings and experiences publishing their work are also presented. Quantitative and qualitative results support the need to allocate better resources to correctional researchers and agencies if the goal is to improve our criminal justice system more effectively and efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251344891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking Through: Surveying the Experiences of Social and Behavioral Science Researchers Working in Correctional Environments

Jennifer Eno Louden, Ashley B. Batastini, Virginia Barber‐Rioja, Alyssa A. Hoyt
1 citations
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
article

Breaking Through: Surveying the Experiences of Social and Behavioral Science Researchers Working in Correctional Environments

Jennifer Eno Louden, Ashley B. Batastini, Virginia Barber‐Rioja, Alyssa A. Hoyt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although barriers to conducting correctional research are familiar to those who do this work, there have been no known efforts to document the challenges reported by social and behavioral science researchers across the United States. Quantitative and qualitative analyses from 83 respondents revealed barriers mostly centered on concerns or constraints by a partnering correctional agency; however, few respondents reported issues with the agency’s willingness to collaborate. The extent of barriers was not associated with researchers’ career level, age, years of experience, or employment setting. Despite challenges, participants were primarily motivated to do this work by their interests in addressing social justice issues. Researchers’ strategies for conducting research in correctional settings and experiences publishing their work are also presented. Quantitative and qualitative results support the need to allocate better resources to correctional researchers and agencies if the goal is to improve our criminal justice system more effectively and efficiently.

Criminal Justice and BehaviorVol. 52(10)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), New York University (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Breaking Through: Surveying the Experiences of Social and Behavioral Science Researchers Working in Correctional Environments — Jennifer Eno Louden, Ashley B. Batastini, et al. · Criminal Justice and Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS