Comparative nutrient and sensory analysis of eight different commercial Chlorella powders

A growing global population and climate change challenge conventional agriculture and global food safety. Microalgae are an emerging sustainable nutrient food resource, increasingly regarded as an important component for the human diet. The chlorophyte Chlorella sp. is regulated and commercialized for food applications. Commercial Chlorella preparations are either produced by heterotrophic fermentation or photoautotrophic cultivation in bioreactors or outdoor ponds. Products can differ significantly with regard to taxonomy of the production strain, changed genetic properties due to strain development, cultivation conditions, and downstream biomass processing methods. Notably, heterotrophic strains may be adapted to generate little or no photosynthetic pigments, resulting in yellow or white variant. In this study, eight different commercial Chlorella products from different EU suppliers were analyzed and compared regarding identity of the production strain, macro-and micronutrient profiles, sensory properties, as well as microbial load. The production processes featured different cultivation methods, production strains, genetic variants (yellow and white) and downstream processing methods. Data indicates significant variations between the Chlorella products. White and yellow Chlorella products showed different protein and taste profiles compared to green, photosynthetically competent wild type strains. We confirmed relatively high and stable protein concentrations but could detect variations in sugar and specifically lipid and vitamin profiles depending on strain, cultivation and downstream processing methods. The microbial load varied strongly between closed and open cultivation systems but was compliant with legislative (EFSA) specifications for all samples. The comparative nutrient- and sensory data set presented in this study will aid in selecting algae products for the development of innovative foods, thereby accelerating adoption and differentiation of algae food products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Food Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2025.1534438
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Algal biology and biofuel production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative nutrient and sensory analysis of eight different commercial Chlorella powders

Tillmann Peest, Thomas Brück, Daniel Garbe, Corinna Dawid et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Food Science and Technology
Algal biology and biofuel production
0.73
article

Comparative nutrient and sensory analysis of eight different commercial Chlorella powders

Tillmann Peest, Thomas Brück, Daniel Garbe, Corinna Dawid, Thomas Becker, F. Utz, Michael Rychlik, Michael Paper, Tom Nilges, Darío Garay, Lisa Obermaier, Jennifer Schneiderbanger, Felix Melcher, Wolfram Manuel Brück, Andrea Spaccasassi, Nikolaus I. Stellner, Max Koch
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A growing global population and climate change challenge conventional agriculture and global food safety. Microalgae are an emerging sustainable nutrient food resource, increasingly regarded as an important component for the human diet. The chlorophyte Chlorella sp. is regulated and commercialized for food applications. Commercial Chlorella preparations are either produced by heterotrophic fermentation or photoautotrophic cultivation in bioreactors or outdoor ponds. Products can differ significantly with regard to taxonomy of the production strain, changed genetic properties due to strain development, cultivation conditions, and downstream biomass processing methods. Notably, heterotrophic strains may be adapted to generate little or no photosynthetic pigments, resulting in yellow or white variant. In this study, eight different commercial Chlorella products from different EU suppliers were analyzed and compared regarding identity of the production strain, macro-and micronutrient profiles, sensory properties, as well as microbial load. The production processes featured different cultivation methods, production strains, genetic variants (yellow and white) and downstream processing methods. Data indicates significant variations between the Chlorella products. White and yellow Chlorella products showed different protein and taste profiles compared to green, photosynthetically competent wild type strains. We confirmed relatively high and stable protein concentrations but could detect variations in sugar and specifically lipid and vitamin profiles depending on strain, cultivation and downstream processing methods. The microbial load varied strongly between closed and open cultivation systems but was compliant with legislative (EFSA) specifications for all samples. The comparative nutrient- and sensory data set presented in this study will aid in selecting algae products for the development of innovative foods, thereby accelerating adoption and differentiation of algae food products.

Frontiers in Food Science and TechnologyVol. 5
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Algal biology and biofuel production
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.