Trust and AI weight: human-AI collaboration in organizational management decision-making

Introduction The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making in human resource management. Since human and AI each possesses distinct strengths in the realm of decision-making, the synergy between human and AI agent has the potential to significantly enhance both the efficiency and the quality of managerial decision-making processes. Although assigning decision weights to AI agents presents innovative avenues for human-AI collaboration, the underlying mechanisms driving the allocation of decision weights to AI agents remain inadequately understood. To elucidate these mechanisms, this paper examines the influence of trust in AI on AI weight allocation within the framework of human-AI cooperation, leveraging the Socio-Cognitive Model of Trust (SCMT). Methods We conducted a series of survey studies involving scenario-based decision-making tasks. Study 1 examined the relationship between trust in AI and AI weight among 111 managers about employee recruitment tasks. Study 2 surveyed 210 managers using employee performance evaluation tasks. Results The results of Study 1 indicated that trust in AI enhances the decisional weight attributed to AI agents, and willingness to collaborate with AI mediates trust in AI and the weight of AI in personnel selection. The findings of Study 2 revealed that the perceived free will of AI agents negatively moderates the relationship between trust in AI and willing to collaborate with AI, such that the relationship is weaker when individuals perceive a higher degree of free will in AI agents than a lower degree. Discussion Theoretically, this paper advances the understanding of the function of trust in human-AI interaction by exploring the trust development from attitude to act in human-AI cooperative decision-making. Practically, it offers valuable insights into the design of AI agent and organizational management within the context of human-AI collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1419403
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust and AI weight: human-AI collaboration in organizational management decision-making

Xiaoxi Chen, Jiale Wang, Yanjun Wen
5 citations
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

Trust and AI weight: human-AI collaboration in organizational management decision-making

Xiaoxi Chen, Jiale Wang, Yanjun Wen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Introduction The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making in human resource management. Since human and AI each possesses distinct strengths in the realm of decision-making, the synergy between human and AI agent has the potential to significantly enhance both the efficiency and the quality of managerial decision-making processes. Although assigning decision weights to AI agents presents innovative avenues for human-AI collaboration, the underlying mechanisms driving the allocation of decision weights to AI agents remain inadequately understood. To elucidate these mechanisms, this paper examines the influence of trust in AI on AI weight allocation within the framework of human-AI cooperation, leveraging the Socio-Cognitive Model of Trust (SCMT). Methods We conducted a series of survey studies involving scenario-based decision-making tasks. Study 1 examined the relationship between trust in AI and AI weight among 111 managers about employee recruitment tasks. Study 2 surveyed 210 managers using employee performance evaluation tasks. Results The results of Study 1 indicated that trust in AI enhances the decisional weight attributed to AI agents, and willingness to collaborate with AI mediates trust in AI and the weight of AI in personnel selection. The findings of Study 2 revealed that the perceived free will of AI agents negatively moderates the relationship between trust in AI and willing to collaborate with AI, such that the relationship is weaker when individuals perceive a higher degree of free will in AI agents than a lower degree. Discussion Theoretically, this paper advances the understanding of the function of trust in human-AI interaction by exploring the trust development from attitude to act in human-AI cooperative decision-making. Practically, it offers valuable insights into the design of AI agent and organizational management within the context of human-AI collaboration.

Frontiers in Organizational PsychologyVol. 3
Jinan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust and AI weight: human-AI collaboration in organizational management decision-making — Xiaoxi Chen, Jiale Wang, et al. · Frontiers in Organizational Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS