Results from an Einstein@Home Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Cassiopeia A and Vela Jr. Using LIGO O2 Data

Abstract We conduct two searches for continuous, nearly monochromatic gravitational waves originating from the central compact objects in the supernova remnants Cassiopeia A (Cas A) and Vela Jr. using public LIGO data. The search for Cas A targets signal frequencies between 20 Hz and 400 Hz, and the Vela Jr. search covers between 400 and 1700 Hz. They both investigate the broadest set of waveforms ever considered with highly sensitive deterministic search methods. Above 1500 Hz, the Vela Jr. search is the most sensitive carried out thus far, improving on previous results by over 300%. Above 976 Hz these results improve on existing ones by 50%. In all, we investigate over 10 18 waveforms, leveraging the computational power donated by thousands of Einstein@Home volunteers. We perform a four-stage follow-up on more than 6 million waveforms. None of the considered waveforms survives the follow-up scrutiny, indicating no significant detection candidate. Our null results constrain the maximum amplitude of continuous signals as a function of signal frequency from the targets. The most stringent 90% confidence upper limit for Cas A is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> near 200 Hz, and for Vela Jr. it is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>8.9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> near 400 Hz. Translated into upper limits on the ellipticity and r- mode amplitude, our results probe physically interesting regions: for example, the ellipticity of Vela Jr. is constrained to be smaller than 10 −7 across the frequency band, with a tighter constraint of less than 2 × 10 −8 at the highest frequencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add5f5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results from an Einstein@Home Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Cassiopeia A and Vela Jr. Using LIGO O2 Data

Jorge Morales, H.-B. Eggenstein, M. A. Papa, J. Ming et al.
1 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
article

Results from an Einstein@Home Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Cassiopeia A and Vela Jr. Using LIGO O2 Data

Jorge Morales, H.-B. Eggenstein, M. A. Papa, J. Ming, Bernd Machenschalk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We conduct two searches for continuous, nearly monochromatic gravitational waves originating from the central compact objects in the supernova remnants Cassiopeia A (Cas A) and Vela Jr. using public LIGO data. The search for Cas A targets signal frequencies between 20 Hz and 400 Hz, and the Vela Jr. search covers between 400 and 1700 Hz. They both investigate the broadest set of waveforms ever considered with highly sensitive deterministic search methods. Above 1500 Hz, the Vela Jr. search is the most sensitive carried out thus far, improving on previous results by over 300%. Above 976 Hz these results improve on existing ones by 50%. In all, we investigate over 10 18 waveforms, leveraging the computational power donated by thousands of Einstein@Home volunteers. We perform a four-stage follow-up on more than 6 million waveforms. None of the considered waveforms survives the follow-up scrutiny, indicating no significant detection candidate. Our null results constrain the maximum amplitude of continuous signals as a function of signal frequency from the targets. The most stringent 90% confidence upper limit for Cas A is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7.3</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> near 200 Hz, and for Vela Jr. it is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>%</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>≈</mml:mo> <mml:mn>8.9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>26</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> near 400 Hz. Translated into upper limits on the ellipticity and r- mode amplitude, our results probe physically interesting regions: for example, the ellipticity of Vela Jr. is constrained to be smaller than 10 −7 across the frequency band, with a tighter constraint of less than 2 × 10 −8 at the highest frequencies.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 986(2)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.