STUDI KOMPARATIF PENGUJIAN MANUAL DAN PENGUJIAN OTOMATIS DENGAN CYPRESS PADA WEBSITE

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of manual testing and automated testing using Cypress on the Mangkasir website, a web-based point of sales (POS) system. The research method used is a comparative study with a quantitative approach, involving direct testing of key features such as login, product management, transactions, and store management. Data were collected based on execution time and test case results for both methods. The testing results indicate that automated testing provides faster execution, higher consistency, and greater script reusability compared to manual testing, which is generally slower and prone to human error. Although several features could not be tested comprehensively due to technical limitations, the findings recommend the adoption of automated testing as a more efficient solution for software testing, especially in repetitive testing scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empiris.
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62335/empiris.v2i2.1354
Primary Topic
Edcuational Technology Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDI KOMPARATIF PENGUJIAN MANUAL DAN PENGUJIAN OTOMATIS DENGAN CYPRESS PADA WEBSITE

Rahayu Amaliyah Kamisr
Empiris.
Edcuational Technology Systems
article

STUDI KOMPARATIF PENGUJIAN MANUAL DAN PENGUJIAN OTOMATIS DENGAN CYPRESS PADA WEBSITE

Rahayu Amaliyah Kamisr
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of manual testing and automated testing using Cypress on the Mangkasir website, a web-based point of sales (POS) system. The research method used is a comparative study with a quantitative approach, involving direct testing of key features such as login, product management, transactions, and store management. Data were collected based on execution time and test case results for both methods. The testing results indicate that automated testing provides faster execution, higher consistency, and greater script reusability compared to manual testing, which is generally slower and prone to human error. Although several features could not be tested comprehensively due to technical limitations, the findings recommend the adoption of automated testing as a more efficient solution for software testing, especially in repetitive testing scenarios.

Empiris.Vol. 2(2)
Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Edcuational Technology Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.