Hans Christian Andersen in Ukraine

Abstract This paper studies Ukrainian translations of Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales done during pre-Soviet and Soviet Russia, and post-Soviet Ukraine. It focuses on pre-Soviet translations by Mykhailo Starytsky (1840–1904), Soviet translations by Oksana Ivanenko (1906–1997), and Natalia Sydorova’s translations in contemporary Ukraine. Building on theoretical insights of Lawrence Venuti, we explore the kind of formal and thematic interpretants these translators employ. We argue that while Starytsky’s Ukrainian translations of Andersen’s fairy tales can be understood in terms of foreignization because they challenged the political and cultural hegemony of Russian, Ivanenko’s translations are an example of wholesale domestication since they reinforce the hegemony of the Russian language during the Soviet era. Sydorova’s translations published in contemporary Ukraine also domesticate Andersen’s fairy tales, but without perpetuating Russian cultural dominance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Literature
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-01002008
Primary Topic
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hans Christian Andersen in Ukraine

Mushtaq Bilal, Inga Kapustian
Journal of World Literature
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
article

Hans Christian Andersen in Ukraine

Mushtaq Bilal, Inga Kapustian
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies Ukrainian translations of Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales done during pre-Soviet and Soviet Russia, and post-Soviet Ukraine. It focuses on pre-Soviet translations by Mykhailo Starytsky (1840–1904), Soviet translations by Oksana Ivanenko (1906–1997), and Natalia Sydorova’s translations in contemporary Ukraine. Building on theoretical insights of Lawrence Venuti, we explore the kind of formal and thematic interpretants these translators employ. We argue that while Starytsky’s Ukrainian translations of Andersen’s fairy tales can be understood in terms of foreignization because they challenged the political and cultural hegemony of Russian, Ivanenko’s translations are an example of wholesale domestication since they reinforce the hegemony of the Russian language during the Soviet era. Sydorova’s translations published in contemporary Ukraine also domesticate Andersen’s fairy tales, but without perpetuating Russian cultural dominance.

Journal of World LiteratureVol. 10(2)
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.