Translating Hans Christian Andersen in Colonial Korea

Abstract This study examines the ideological hybridity in Korean translations of Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales during early twentieth-century colonial Korea, when translation was a key tool for cultural modernization. Analyzing translations published in fairy tale anthologies, this study categorizes them by Christian, socialist, and nationalist orientations. Although these translations sought to promote distinct ideological messages, they often generated contradictions, as religious, political, and nationalistic reinterpretations introduced tensions within the texts. This hybridity in translation is further reinforced by the ambiguity, irony, and multilayered meanings inherent in Andersen’s original works. This study demonstrates that translation is not merely ideological reinforcement but a hybridized space where competing discourses intersect, reshaping meaning in unpredictable ways. In this light, the interpretative openness of Andersen’s works may also help explain why his fairy tales, unlike many others translated in early twentieth-century Korea, continue to be retranslated and read in Korea today as part of the global literary canon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Literature
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-01002006
Primary Topic
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating Hans Christian Andersen in Colonial Korea

Seong-Woo Choi
Journal of World Literature
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
article

Translating Hans Christian Andersen in Colonial Korea

Seong-Woo Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the ideological hybridity in Korean translations of Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tales during early twentieth-century colonial Korea, when translation was a key tool for cultural modernization. Analyzing translations published in fairy tale anthologies, this study categorizes them by Christian, socialist, and nationalist orientations. Although these translations sought to promote distinct ideological messages, they often generated contradictions, as religious, political, and nationalistic reinterpretations introduced tensions within the texts. This hybridity in translation is further reinforced by the ambiguity, irony, and multilayered meanings inherent in Andersen’s original works. This study demonstrates that translation is not merely ideological reinforcement but a hybridized space where competing discourses intersect, reshaping meaning in unpredictable ways. In this light, the interpretative openness of Andersen’s works may also help explain why his fairy tales, unlike many others translated in early twentieth-century Korea, continue to be retranslated and read in Korea today as part of the global literary canon.

Journal of World LiteratureVol. 10(2)
Baewha Women's University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.