AI Can Revolutionise Education but Technology Is Not Enough: Human Development Meets Cultural Evolution

Artificial Intelligence could dramatically boost educational outcomes and close gaps – but only if policymakers take a human-centred, systems-level approach to AI integration. Cultural evolution, the science of how beliefs, values, norms, technologies and institutions evolve over time, offers a framework for understanding the promises and pitfalls of different approaches to AI in education policy. Using this perspective and drawing on comparative evidence from Estonia’s successful “Tiger Leap” initiative and the failed “One Laptop Per Child” (OLPC) programme, we identify three missteps that derail national strategies: (1) techno-fix thinking, (2) weak infrastructure and teacher support and (3) lack of local adaptation. Uruguay’s Plan Ceibal is a notable exception to OLPC’s general failures, revealing why technology alone is not enough. We map AI’s headline promises – personalised tutoring, higher teacher productivity, smaller equity gaps – onto the specific capabilities each can expand, and we highlight three systemic risks: digital exclusion, algorithmic bias and widening inequalities. Synthesising these lessons, we propose a practical roadmap. AI will revolutionise education and enhance human development only insofar as it is embedded in human centred systems that grow everyone’s capabilities and freedom to learn, create and participate in society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2025.2517740
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Can Revolutionise Education but Technology Is Not Enough: Human Development Meets Cultural Evolution

Yao Hui-jun, Michael Muthukrishna, Jiner Dai, Riya Sabherwal et al.
2 citations
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
Cognitive Science and Mapping
4.96
article

AI Can Revolutionise Education but Technology Is Not Enough: Human Development Meets Cultural Evolution

Yao Hui-jun, Michael Muthukrishna, Jiner Dai, Riya Sabherwal, Karlijn Vanoppen, Diana Panizo Madrid
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence could dramatically boost educational outcomes and close gaps – but only if policymakers take a human-centred, systems-level approach to AI integration. Cultural evolution, the science of how beliefs, values, norms, technologies and institutions evolve over time, offers a framework for understanding the promises and pitfalls of different approaches to AI in education policy. Using this perspective and drawing on comparative evidence from Estonia’s successful “Tiger Leap” initiative and the failed “One Laptop Per Child” (OLPC) programme, we identify three missteps that derail national strategies: (1) techno-fix thinking, (2) weak infrastructure and teacher support and (3) lack of local adaptation. Uruguay’s Plan Ceibal is a notable exception to OLPC’s general failures, revealing why technology alone is not enough. We map AI’s headline promises – personalised tutoring, higher teacher productivity, smaller equity gaps – onto the specific capabilities each can expand, and we highlight three systemic risks: digital exclusion, algorithmic bias and widening inequalities. Synthesising these lessons, we propose a practical roadmap. AI will revolutionise education and enhance human development only insofar as it is embedded in human centred systems that grow everyone’s capabilities and freedom to learn, create and participate in society.

Journal of Human Development and CapabilitiesVol. 26(3)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.