Economic Advantages of Original Container Closure Systems in Combination Product Development: Scenarios with Expert Validation and Industry-Quantified Cost-Time Savings

Many on-body delivery systems (OBDSs) for subcutaneous (SC) delivery require a change in primary container closure system (CCS). This necessitates compatibility and stability testing with original packaging materials and distribution and assembly, which are often laborious and time-consuming. Exploring new primary CCSs rather than using an original CCS can introduce risks, prolong timelines, and increase costs. In this study, 21 US-based combination product experts completed a double-blinded online survey between 6 October and 20 November 2023. The survey included 15 screening questions and 23 survey questions, including questions about compatibility issues between new CCSs and drug and stability testing for new CCSs. The largest proportion of participants (28.6%) reported that 5%-10% of the products that they had worked directly on had experienced compatibility issues between a new CCS and a drug, with a weighted mean of 11.9%. The most common compatibility issues were particulate challenges in 55.6%, sterility in 27.8%, and leachables in 16.7%. Most respondents (76.2%) rated the timeline showing that using an original CCS can save 12-24 months as somewhat (38.1%) or very (38.1%) representative. Most participants (57.1%) estimated that the range of direct costs, including development costs, drug product, engineering runs, line changes, and other costs, when using an OBDS with a new CCS is $10-15 million, 38.1% estimated <$10 million, and 4.8% estimated $21-25 million. Most participants (80.9%) reported that challenges in the primary CCS qualification/validation process delay entry of combination products into clinical trials or delay their commercial launch. The weighted mean of the delay was 9.7 months. Using an original CCS during combination product development would therefore be of significant economic benefit to the development of combination products in terms of time, cost, and risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000002.1
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Advantages of Original Container Closure Systems in Combination Product Development: Scenarios with Expert Validation and Industry-Quantified Cost-Time Savings

Mehul Desai, William Rich, Lawton Laurence, Fran DeGrazio et al.
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

Economic Advantages of Original Container Closure Systems in Combination Product Development: Scenarios with Expert Validation and Industry-Quantified Cost-Time Savings

Mehul Desai, William Rich, Lawton Laurence, Fran DeGrazio, Daniel Waites, Shirish Ingawale
article en

Abstract

Many on-body delivery systems (OBDSs) for subcutaneous (SC) delivery require a change in primary container closure system (CCS). This necessitates compatibility and stability testing with original packaging materials and distribution and assembly, which are often laborious and time-consuming. Exploring new primary CCSs rather than using an original CCS can introduce risks, prolong timelines, and increase costs. In this study, 21 US-based combination product experts completed a double-blinded online survey between 6 October and 20 November 2023. The survey included 15 screening questions and 23 survey questions, including questions about compatibility issues between new CCSs and drug and stability testing for new CCSs. The largest proportion of participants (28.6%) reported that 5%-10% of the products that they had worked directly on had experienced compatibility issues between a new CCS and a drug, with a weighted mean of 11.9%. The most common compatibility issues were particulate challenges in 55.6%, sterility in 27.8%, and leachables in 16.7%. Most respondents (76.2%) rated the timeline showing that using an original CCS can save 12-24 months as somewhat (38.1%) or very (38.1%) representative. Most participants (57.1%) estimated that the range of direct costs, including development costs, drug product, engineering runs, line changes, and other costs, when using an OBDS with a new CCS is $10-15 million, 38.1% estimated <$10 million, and 4.8% estimated $21-25 million. Most participants (80.9%) reported that challenges in the primary CCS qualification/validation process delay entry of combination products into clinical trials or delay their commercial launch. The weighted mean of the delay was 9.7 months. Using an original CCS during combination product development would therefore be of significant economic benefit to the development of combination products in terms of time, cost, and risk.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and TechnologyVol. 79(5)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Enable Ireland (IE), Apellis Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Strategic Solutions Consulting (United States) (US), The Stables (GB), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Apellis Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.