Uncertainties in Ground‐Based Visual Double Star Measures—<scp>II</scp> Accuracy of Measures

ABSTRACT Letchford and White 2025, Paper I, determined the uncertainties in ground‐based historic measures of double stars. In this paper, the accuracy of 26,205 ground‐based measures of 857 visual double stars, made since 1780, is determined relative to space‐based measures based on positions and proper motion from the HIPPARCOS (via ASCC) and Gaia DR3 missions. We determine the accuracy of measures for the epoch of observation, the size of the telescope, the different attached instruments, and the filter applied. We find that the accuracy of the measures is improving with time; however, the typical telescope used for double‐star observations has been, and continues to be, relatively small. Modern instrumentation such as speckle interferometry and lucky imaging has advanced the accuracy by a factor of ten over traditional micrometre measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomische Nachrichten
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.70015
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainties in Ground‐Based Visual Double Star Measures—II Accuracy of Measures

Roderick R. Letchford, Graeme L. White
Astronomische Nachrichten
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Uncertainties in Ground‐Based Visual Double Star Measures—II Accuracy of Measures

Roderick R. Letchford, Graeme L. White
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Letchford and White 2025, Paper I, determined the uncertainties in ground‐based historic measures of double stars. In this paper, the accuracy of 26,205 ground‐based measures of 857 visual double stars, made since 1780, is determined relative to space‐based measures based on positions and proper motion from the HIPPARCOS (via ASCC) and Gaia DR3 missions. We determine the accuracy of measures for the epoch of observation, the size of the telescope, the different attached instruments, and the filter applied. We find that the accuracy of the measures is improving with time; however, the typical telescope used for double‐star observations has been, and continues to be, relatively small. Modern instrumentation such as speckle interferometry and lucky imaging has advanced the accuracy by a factor of ten over traditional micrometre measurements.

Astronomische NachrichtenVol. 346(6)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
University of Southern Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncertainties in Ground‐Based Visual Double Star Measures—<scp>II</scp> Accuracy of Measures — Roderick R. Letchford, Graeme L. White · Astronomische Nachrichten (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS