Emotional witness effect: implications for memory accuracy, perceptions, misinformation, and credibility in forensic contexts

Purpose The emotional state of a witness can significantly impact how they are perceived within a forensic setting. If a witness’ emotions appear incongruent with their statement, they may be perceived as deceptive, untrustworthy, or inaccurate. This paper aims to examine the impact of a witness’ emotional state and gender on decision makers’ perceptions and processing of information. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the impact of a witness’ emotional tone (neutral versus emotional) in video statements on participant perceptions and memory. It explores gendered expectations around emotionality, considering potential recall benefits of emotional expression against possible detriments, such as reduced focus on factual content and greater susceptibility to misinformation. Using video statements from a male and a female actor, this paper assessed how emotional tone affects credibility judgements and recall. Findings Participants displayed strong expectations based on gendered emotional norms. Witnesses who violated these norms were judged more negatively in credibility, perceived emotionality and empathic association. Participants expected unemotional behaviour from males and emotional displays from females. Emotionality in witnesses increased susceptibility to misinformation, while an unemotional female witness facilitated the most accurate memory recall. Male witnesses, regardless of emotionality, enhanced suspect detail recall. These findings highlight the interplay between gender, emotionality and judicial accuracy. Originality/value This study uniquely examines the emotional witness effect through the context of gender expectations. By addressing how emotionality influences perceptions and memory recall, it highlights the complexity of these interactions and offers recommendations for future research. The findings contribute to understanding gender–emotion dynamics in forensic contexts, providing insights into their influence on judgement and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-12-2024-0138
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional witness effect: implications for memory accuracy, perceptions, misinformation, and credibility in forensic contexts

Cody Normitta Porter, Mircea Zloteanu
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Emotional witness effect: implications for memory accuracy, perceptions, misinformation, and credibility in forensic contexts

Cody Normitta Porter, Mircea Zloteanu
article en

Abstract

Purpose The emotional state of a witness can significantly impact how they are perceived within a forensic setting. If a witness’ emotions appear incongruent with their statement, they may be perceived as deceptive, untrustworthy, or inaccurate. This paper aims to examine the impact of a witness’ emotional state and gender on decision makers’ perceptions and processing of information. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the impact of a witness’ emotional tone (neutral versus emotional) in video statements on participant perceptions and memory. It explores gendered expectations around emotionality, considering potential recall benefits of emotional expression against possible detriments, such as reduced focus on factual content and greater susceptibility to misinformation. Using video statements from a male and a female actor, this paper assessed how emotional tone affects credibility judgements and recall. Findings Participants displayed strong expectations based on gendered emotional norms. Witnesses who violated these norms were judged more negatively in credibility, perceived emotionality and empathic association. Participants expected unemotional behaviour from males and emotional displays from females. Emotionality in witnesses increased susceptibility to misinformation, while an unemotional female witness facilitated the most accurate memory recall. Male witnesses, regardless of emotionality, enhanced suspect detail recall. These findings highlight the interplay between gender, emotionality and judicial accuracy. Originality/value This study uniquely examines the emotional witness effect through the context of gender expectations. By addressing how emotionality influences perceptions and memory recall, it highlights the complexity of these interactions and offers recommendations for future research. The findings contribute to understanding gender–emotion dynamics in forensic contexts, providing insights into their influence on judgement and decision-making.

Journal of Criminal PsychologyVol. 16(2)
University of the West of England (GB), Kingston University London (GB), Kingston University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.