A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives

ABSTRACT This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE‐HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed‐methods approach, combining a deductive meta‐synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE‐HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all‐encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high‐quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE‐HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student‐centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE‐HEIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70030
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives

Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani, Hayden Godfrey, Zainab Sadat Mostafavi
2 citations
Higher Education Quarterly
Educational Innovations and Challenges
6.49
article

A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives

Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani, Hayden Godfrey, Zainab Sadat Mostafavi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE‐HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed‐methods approach, combining a deductive meta‐synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE‐HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all‐encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high‐quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE‐HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student‐centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE‐HEIs.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 79(3)
University of Tehran (IR), Harvard University Press (US), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.