COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE TRANSLATION AND HUMAN TRANSLATION THROUGH THE LENS OF SKOPOS THEORY

This research compares human and machine (Google Translator) translations from English to Urdu in Skopos Theory perspective. It takes examples from different genres of texts, online as well as published, to demonstrate how coherence, fidelity, and cultural adaptation can vary between translations done by humans and machines. Machine translations are shown as convenient and time saving but lacking in the ability to capture cultural nuances while maintaining coherence or fidelity that is the main focus of Skopos theory. The study thus highlights the importance of human expertise in translation and how it addresses the target audience and points out where machine systems fall short. It is not enough for machine translators to be linguistically accurate; they should also ensure cultural appropriateness, contextual coherence and fidelity to the source text’s intention as this research has demonstrated through different examples.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt718
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE TRANSLATION AND HUMAN TRANSLATION THROUGH THE LENS OF SKOPOS THEORY

Alishba Sadiq Kashmala Ramzan
Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)
Translation Studies and Practices
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE TRANSLATION AND HUMAN TRANSLATION THROUGH THE LENS OF SKOPOS THEORY

Alishba Sadiq Kashmala Ramzan
article en

Abstract

This research compares human and machine (Google Translator) translations from English to Urdu in Skopos Theory perspective. It takes examples from different genres of texts, online as well as published, to demonstrate how coherence, fidelity, and cultural adaptation can vary between translations done by humans and machines. Machine translations are shown as convenient and time saving but lacking in the ability to capture cultural nuances while maintaining coherence or fidelity that is the main focus of Skopos theory. The study thus highlights the importance of human expertise in translation and how it addresses the target audience and points out where machine systems fall short. It is not enough for machine translators to be linguistically accurate; they should also ensure cultural appropriateness, contextual coherence and fidelity to the source text’s intention as this research has demonstrated through different examples.

Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT)Vol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.