Self-Efficacy, Resilience, Motivation and Teachers’ Instructional Leadership Styles

The teaching profession is undoubtedly one of the most challenging and complex jobs globally, due to its intellectual demands, emotional depth, and essential service-oriented nature. In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, effective teaching transcends mere task management; it centers on cultivating an environment conducive to student growth, engagement, and academic achievement. This research examined the influence of teachers' self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation on their instructional leadership styles in higher education institutions of Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Conducted using a predictive correlational research design, the study involved 159 full-time instructors from Tagoloan and Opol Community Colleges as respondents using a proportionate stratified random sampling method. Data was collected through questionnaire adapted from validated sources to measure self-efficacy, resilience, motivation, and instructional leadership. Meanwhile, the over-all mean of self-efficacy is M=3.87 (SD=.824) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of self-efficacy. On the other hand, the over-all mean of resilience is M=3.71 (SD=.84), described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of resilience. Moreover, the over-all mean of motivation is M=3.79 (SD=.804) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of motivation. Lastly, the over-all mean of instructional leadership style is M=3.75 (SD=.869) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of instructional leadership Styles. Results of Pearson R correlation analysis showed a significant correlation among variables, indicating that instructional leadership increases with higher self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation. Through multiple regression analysis, these factors were significant collective predictors of instructional leadership, with resilience identified as the most significant predictor. To create more decisive instructional leadership and improved educational outcomes, this research shows the need for tailored professional development programs on self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation for educators. The study further suggests a causal model for future research on leadership development under similar educational conditions. Results have implications for administrators, educators, and policymakers in designing strategies to support teacher development, resilience, and leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.400604
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Efficacy, Resilience, Motivation and Teachers’ Instructional Leadership Styles

M.L. de Cabrejas, Elimar Jamisola
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Self-Efficacy, Resilience, Motivation and Teachers’ Instructional Leadership Styles

M.L. de Cabrejas, Elimar Jamisola
article en

Abstract

The teaching profession is undoubtedly one of the most challenging and complex jobs globally, due to its intellectual demands, emotional depth, and essential service-oriented nature. In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, effective teaching transcends mere task management; it centers on cultivating an environment conducive to student growth, engagement, and academic achievement. This research examined the influence of teachers' self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation on their instructional leadership styles in higher education institutions of Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Conducted using a predictive correlational research design, the study involved 159 full-time instructors from Tagoloan and Opol Community Colleges as respondents using a proportionate stratified random sampling method. Data was collected through questionnaire adapted from validated sources to measure self-efficacy, resilience, motivation, and instructional leadership. Meanwhile, the over-all mean of self-efficacy is M=3.87 (SD=.824) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of self-efficacy. On the other hand, the over-all mean of resilience is M=3.71 (SD=.84), described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of resilience. Moreover, the over-all mean of motivation is M=3.79 (SD=.804) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of motivation. Lastly, the over-all mean of instructional leadership style is M=3.75 (SD=.869) described as agree and can be interpreted that the teachers have a high level of instructional leadership Styles. Results of Pearson R correlation analysis showed a significant correlation among variables, indicating that instructional leadership increases with higher self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation. Through multiple regression analysis, these factors were significant collective predictors of instructional leadership, with resilience identified as the most significant predictor. To create more decisive instructional leadership and improved educational outcomes, this research shows the need for tailored professional development programs on self-efficacy, resilience, and motivation for educators. The study further suggests a causal model for future research on leadership development under similar educational conditions. Results have implications for administrators, educators, and policymakers in designing strategies to support teacher development, resilience, and leadership.

Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 40(6)
Liceo de Cagayan University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.