The Nominative and Communicative Features of Paralinguistic Means in Modern Linguistics

This article analyzes the nature of paralinguistic means, their types and their role in the communicative process on an important scientific basis. G.V. Kolshansky divided paralinguistic means into phonational, kinetic and graphic types based on a structural approach and consistently revealed their structural aspects. Phonation means include sound properties such as tone, timbre, speed of speech; kinetic means include gestures, gestures and body movements; graphic means include graphic forms expressed in the text. The study presents the views of E.M. Vereshchagin and V.G. Kostomarov on paralinguistic and nonverbal communication, and highlights the reflection of gestures and facial expressions in different languages, their semantic loads and naming. The inclusion of nonverbal units in the phraseological system is justified by G.E. Kreidlin's proposals on gestural phraseology. The article highlights the theoretical and practical importance of paralinguistic elements in the field of linguistics and communication and creates a solid methodological foundation for scientific research in this area.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European International Journal of Philological Sciences
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-05-19
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nominative and Communicative Features of Paralinguistic Means in Modern Linguistics

Tamilla Annazarova Dilshod qizi
European International Journal of Philological Sciences
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

The Nominative and Communicative Features of Paralinguistic Means in Modern Linguistics

Tamilla Annazarova Dilshod qizi
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the nature of paralinguistic means, their types and their role in the communicative process on an important scientific basis. G.V. Kolshansky divided paralinguistic means into phonational, kinetic and graphic types based on a structural approach and consistently revealed their structural aspects. Phonation means include sound properties such as tone, timbre, speed of speech; kinetic means include gestures, gestures and body movements; graphic means include graphic forms expressed in the text. The study presents the views of E.M. Vereshchagin and V.G. Kostomarov on paralinguistic and nonverbal communication, and highlights the reflection of gestures and facial expressions in different languages, their semantic loads and naming. The inclusion of nonverbal units in the phraseological system is justified by G.E. Kreidlin's proposals on gestural phraseology. The article highlights the theoretical and practical importance of paralinguistic elements in the field of linguistics and communication and creates a solid methodological foundation for scientific research in this area.

European International Journal of Philological SciencesVol. 5(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Nominative and Communicative Features of Paralinguistic Means in Modern Linguistics — Tamilla Annazarova Dilshod qizi · European International Journal of Philological Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS