Development Pathways for Green Finance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Comparative Analysis with Three Global Bay Areas

This study examines the development of green finance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) through a comparative analysis with three leading international bay areas: New York, San Francisco, and Tokyo. While the GBA has achieved initial progress in green finance, it faces challenges such as cross-border policy conflicts, market structure imbalances, technological and data deficiencies, underdeveloped ESG ecosystems, weak international influence, and talent shortages. To address these issues, this study proposes a multi-dimensional strategy: establishing a rule-mutual-recognition and regulatory-coordination framework, activating a diversified green financing market, enhancing technological empowerment, fostering ESG ecosystems, and strengthening global competitiveness. These measures aim to drive sustainable green finance development, support industrial upgrading, and elevate the GBA’s international standing in green finance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Finance & Economics
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61173/66t0xb68
Primary Topic
Maritime Ports and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development Pathways for Green Finance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Comparative Analysis with Three Global Bay Areas

Di Liu
1 links
Finance & Economics
Maritime Ports and Logistics
article

Development Pathways for Green Finance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Comparative Analysis with Three Global Bay Areas

Di Liu
article en

Abstract

This study examines the development of green finance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) through a comparative analysis with three leading international bay areas: New York, San Francisco, and Tokyo. While the GBA has achieved initial progress in green finance, it faces challenges such as cross-border policy conflicts, market structure imbalances, technological and data deficiencies, underdeveloped ESG ecosystems, weak international influence, and talent shortages. To address these issues, this study proposes a multi-dimensional strategy: establishing a rule-mutual-recognition and regulatory-coordination framework, activating a diversified green financing market, enhancing technological empowerment, fostering ESG ecosystems, and strengthening global competitiveness. These measures aim to drive sustainable green finance development, support industrial upgrading, and elevate the GBA’s international standing in green finance.

Finance & EconomicsVol. 1(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Maritime Ports and Logistics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.