Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Group's large B‐cell lymphoma cohort

Comparative first-line trials in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) have mostly failed over the last decade. Failures were commonly attributed to overestimation of the progression risk for the control arms, bringing the precision of the international prognostic index (IPI) into scrutiny. Simplified molecular IPI (smIPI), introduced at American Society of Hematology 2023, was developed to address the shortcomings of IPI. This study investigated smIPI and its potential implications as trial eligibility criteria among a multicentre LBCL cohort of 1439 patients. Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 were included. Data were collected from institutional archives. The primary end-point was risk stratification for progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analyses. The smIPI reclassified 38.2% and 5.3% of patients to higher and lower risk groups from IPI, respectively. Patients reclassified to higher risk groups by smIPI had an increased risk of progression than the rest of the group (hazard ratio = 1.34, p = 0.003). High-risk groups classified by IPI and smIPI had similar outcomes (3-year PFS 54.9% vs. 56.3%); however, the high-risk group size was expanded by 35.2% when defined by smIPI. The smIPI is easily applicable and more sensitive than IPI in identifying patients under high risk of progression who are ideal candidates to participate in clinical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.20111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Group's large B‐cell lymphoma cohort

Fevzi Altuntaş, Turgay Ulaş, Esra Terzi Demirsoy, Fatma Keklik Karadağ et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Haematology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.47
article

Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Group's large B‐cell lymphoma cohort

Fevzi Altuntaş, Turgay Ulaş, Esra Terzi Demirsoy, Fatma Keklik Karadağ, Eda Nuhoğlu Kantarcı, Tayfur Toptaş, Tuğrul Elverdi, Meral Uluköylü Mengüç, Deniz Gören, Olga Meltem Akay, Elif Birtaş Ateşoğlu, Burhan Ferhanoğlu, Ebru Pekgüç, Umur Hatipoğlu, Asu Fergün Yılmaz, Metban Mastanzade, Murat Özbalak, Mehmet Sinan Dal, Özgür Mehtap, Muhlis Cem Ar, Güray Saydam, Umut Yılmaz, Taner Tan, Ali Durdu, Merve Apaydın Kayer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Comparative first-line trials in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) have mostly failed over the last decade. Failures were commonly attributed to overestimation of the progression risk for the control arms, bringing the precision of the international prognostic index (IPI) into scrutiny. Simplified molecular IPI (smIPI), introduced at American Society of Hematology 2023, was developed to address the shortcomings of IPI. This study investigated smIPI and its potential implications as trial eligibility criteria among a multicentre LBCL cohort of 1439 patients. Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 were included. Data were collected from institutional archives. The primary end-point was risk stratification for progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analyses. The smIPI reclassified 38.2% and 5.3% of patients to higher and lower risk groups from IPI, respectively. Patients reclassified to higher risk groups by smIPI had an increased risk of progression than the rest of the group (hazard ratio = 1.34, p = 0.003). High-risk groups classified by IPI and smIPI had similar outcomes (3-year PFS 54.9% vs. 56.3%); however, the high-risk group size was expanded by 35.2% when defined by smIPI. The smIPI is easily applicable and more sensitive than IPI in identifying patients under high risk of progression who are ideal candidates to participate in clinical research.

British Journal of HaematologyVol. 208(1)
Yeditepe University (TR), Ministry of Health (TR), Koç University (TR), University of Health Science (KH), Haliç University (TR), Ege University (TR), Memorial Sisli Hospital (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR), Amerikan Hastanesi (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.