Trust in Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Recruiters: Analyzing Candidate Perceptions of Credibility, Ethical Considerations and Decision-Making Transparency in Hiring Process

In today’s fast-paced and technology-driven world, recruitment is no longer just about face-to-face interviews or personal interactions with HR professionals. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), many companies have started using machines and algorithms to shortlist resumes, conduct video interviews, and even make final hiring decisions. This shift has helped organizations save time, process applications faster, and reduce the human workload. But in the middle of all this, one important question is often left out—how do job candidates feel about it? This study is based on a simple yet powerful idea: when hiring, do candidates trust AI recruiters as much as human ones? As someone studying human resource management and business analytics, I wanted to explore how candidates feel when a machine is assessing them. Do they feel it’s fair? Ethical? Transparent? Or do they miss the human touch? To understand this better, I designed a survey-based research using a structured questionnaire and shared it with students, job seekers, and working professionals who have experienced either human-led or AI-based recruitment. The questions focused on things like trust, transparency, ethics, and overall comfort level. I wanted to hear directly from the people going through the process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem50733
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Recruiters: Analyzing Candidate Perceptions of Credibility, Ethical Considerations and Decision-Making Transparency in Hiring Process

Vikas Sharma
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Trust in Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Recruiters: Analyzing Candidate Perceptions of Credibility, Ethical Considerations and Decision-Making Transparency in Hiring Process

Vikas Sharma
article en

Abstract

In today’s fast-paced and technology-driven world, recruitment is no longer just about face-to-face interviews or personal interactions with HR professionals. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), many companies have started using machines and algorithms to shortlist resumes, conduct video interviews, and even make final hiring decisions. This shift has helped organizations save time, process applications faster, and reduce the human workload. But in the middle of all this, one important question is often left out—how do job candidates feel about it? This study is based on a simple yet powerful idea: when hiring, do candidates trust AI recruiters as much as human ones? As someone studying human resource management and business analytics, I wanted to explore how candidates feel when a machine is assessing them. Do they feel it’s fair? Ethical? Transparent? Or do they miss the human touch? To understand this better, I designed a survey-based research using a structured questionnaire and shared it with students, job seekers, and working professionals who have experienced either human-led or AI-based recruitment. The questions focused on things like trust, transparency, ethics, and overall comfort level. I wanted to hear directly from the people going through the process.

INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTVol. 09(06)
Galgotias University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.