Evaluating BSE Curriculum Effectiveness through Student Feedback: A Descriptive Analysis of Learning Outcomes and Career Preparedness

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of the BSE (Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship) by assessing its alignment with educational goals, entrepreneurial skill acquisition, and career preparedness through student feedback. Study Design: Descriptive and quantitative study. Place and Duration of Study: The data were collected during January 2025 to February 2025 at the university, specifically at the BS in Entrepreneurship program. Methodology: This study evaluates the performance and relevance of the Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship (BSE) curriculum using feedback from students gathered from 225 participants at one institution. The research assesses the alignment of the curriculum with educational objectives, competency development, and professional preparedness. The findings emphasize areas for enhancement, especially in course sequencing, and stress the necessity of incorporating student feedback into curriculum development to improve learning outcomes and career preparedness. The research advances Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 by fostering inclusive and high-quality education. Results: Out of 225 respondents that completed the survey, the BSE curriculum received positive consideration ratings and inclusivity, as well as practicality, goal setting, and skill development, received the highest marks. Additionally, the best-rated components were the curriculum’s alignment with educational development goals (the BSE curriculum received the highest marks for this). However, regarding Curriculum Logical Subject Sequencing, “Curriculum Logical Subject Sequencing” got the lowest mean score of 3.07 which indicates the overarching issue of poor course sequencing that needs rectifying. It was also observed that the responses had a moderate scatter or variability, the standard deviations of 0.57 to 0.67 reflecting different levels of student experience. Conclusion: This study highlights that although the BSE curriculum is deemed effective and relevant, there is an underlying issue with course sequencing structure that can be improved. The study underscores the need to actively continue incorporating student feedback towards the design of the curriculum so as to better address the students’ learning outcomes and career prospects. This is aimed at improving the quality of tertiary education and the alignment of educational programs with the objectives of sustainable development goal number four which aims to provide inclusive and quality education at all levels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72098
Primary Topic
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating BSE Curriculum Effectiveness through Student Feedback: A Descriptive Analysis of Learning Outcomes and Career Preparedness

Theresa L. Manga
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
article

Evaluating BSE Curriculum Effectiveness through Student Feedback: A Descriptive Analysis of Learning Outcomes and Career Preparedness

Theresa L. Manga
article en

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of the BSE (Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship) by assessing its alignment with educational goals, entrepreneurial skill acquisition, and career preparedness through student feedback. Study Design: Descriptive and quantitative study. Place and Duration of Study: The data were collected during January 2025 to February 2025 at the university, specifically at the BS in Entrepreneurship program. Methodology: This study evaluates the performance and relevance of the Bachelor of Science in Entrepreneurship (BSE) curriculum using feedback from students gathered from 225 participants at one institution. The research assesses the alignment of the curriculum with educational objectives, competency development, and professional preparedness. The findings emphasize areas for enhancement, especially in course sequencing, and stress the necessity of incorporating student feedback into curriculum development to improve learning outcomes and career preparedness. The research advances Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 by fostering inclusive and high-quality education. Results: Out of 225 respondents that completed the survey, the BSE curriculum received positive consideration ratings and inclusivity, as well as practicality, goal setting, and skill development, received the highest marks. Additionally, the best-rated components were the curriculum’s alignment with educational development goals (the BSE curriculum received the highest marks for this). However, regarding Curriculum Logical Subject Sequencing, “Curriculum Logical Subject Sequencing” got the lowest mean score of 3.07 which indicates the overarching issue of poor course sequencing that needs rectifying. It was also observed that the responses had a moderate scatter or variability, the standard deviations of 0.57 to 0.67 reflecting different levels of student experience. Conclusion: This study highlights that although the BSE curriculum is deemed effective and relevant, there is an underlying issue with course sequencing structure that can be improved. The study underscores the need to actively continue incorporating student feedback towards the design of the curriculum so as to better address the students’ learning outcomes and career prospects. This is aimed at improving the quality of tertiary education and the alignment of educational programs with the objectives of sustainable development goal number four which aims to provide inclusive and quality education at all levels.

Asian Journal of Education and Social StudiesVol. 51(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.