The effectiveness of visualization, auditory, kinesthetic and guided inquiry learning models on students writing skills

This study focuses on the problem of low writing skills in junior high school students' explanatory texts caused by low reading interest, limited vocabulary, and ineffective Learning models. Therefore, a study is needed to compare the effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK.), and Guide Inquiry Learning (GIL.) Learning models in improving students' writing skills on the topic of actual problems. A quasi-experimental design was used with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design involving Santu Petrus Catholic Junior High School students in the academic year 2023/2024 in Pontianak as the population. The sample of this study included 105 students who were selected using the cluster random sampling method. The data obtained were from students' explanation text writing test results, which were then analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe tests. The results showed that the VAK model significantly and more effectively influenced students' explanation text-writing skills than the GIL and DL (conventional) models. Applying the VAK model can be an effective strategy for improving students' writing skills. In addition, the findings guide educators and curriculum developers to design learning that is more responsive and appropriate to students' learning styles. The VAK model allows students to utilize their learning preferences, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic, thus creating a more creative and enjoyable learning environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v10i2.30376
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effectiveness of visualization, auditory, kinesthetic and guided inquiry learning models on students writing skills

Valents Roni Sunarno Alnovgada
KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

The effectiveness of visualization, auditory, kinesthetic and guided inquiry learning models on students writing skills

Valents Roni Sunarno Alnovgada
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on the problem of low writing skills in junior high school students' explanatory texts caused by low reading interest, limited vocabulary, and ineffective Learning models. Therefore, a study is needed to compare the effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK.), and Guide Inquiry Learning (GIL.) Learning models in improving students' writing skills on the topic of actual problems. A quasi-experimental design was used with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design involving Santu Petrus Catholic Junior High School students in the academic year 2023/2024 in Pontianak as the population. The sample of this study included 105 students who were selected using the cluster random sampling method. The data obtained were from students' explanation text writing test results, which were then analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe tests. The results showed that the VAK model significantly and more effectively influenced students' explanation text-writing skills than the GIL and DL (conventional) models. Applying the VAK model can be an effective strategy for improving students' writing skills. In addition, the findings guide educators and curriculum developers to design learning that is more responsive and appropriate to students' learning styles. The VAK model allows students to utilize their learning preferences, such as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic, thus creating a more creative and enjoyable learning environment.

KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and TeachingVol. 10(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.