Digital Communication as a Factor in the Formation of User Identity

The subject of this article is the impact of virtual communication on the process of formation and transformation of the identity of Internet users. The methodological basis of the article is the approach developed by symbolic interactionists (presented in the works of Ch. Cooley, J. Mead and I. Hoffman) and applied by the author to analyze the modern situation taking into account the changed conditions and ways of communication. Personal identity, according to this approach, has a socio-communicative nature and is formed in the process of interactions, i.e. meaningful communicative actions of individuals aimed at the realization of certain goals. Similarities and differences between traditional communication in small groups and digital communication in communities in terms of the principles of information exchange are revealed. The similarities consist in the dialogical nature of communication, the presence of feedback and similar forms of communication. The differences consist in the characteristics of feedback (its indirectness and uncertainty), in the uncertainty of group boundaries (potential boundlessness of groups under the illusion of their boundedness) and hence the characteristics of the participants in the interaction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Respublica Literaria
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47850/rl.2025.6.2.124-134
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Communication as a Factor in the Formation of User Identity

Margarita Bachilo
Respublica Literaria
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

Digital Communication as a Factor in the Formation of User Identity

Margarita Bachilo
article en

Abstract

The subject of this article is the impact of virtual communication on the process of formation and transformation of the identity of Internet users. The methodological basis of the article is the approach developed by symbolic interactionists (presented in the works of Ch. Cooley, J. Mead and I. Hoffman) and applied by the author to analyze the modern situation taking into account the changed conditions and ways of communication. Personal identity, according to this approach, has a socio-communicative nature and is formed in the process of interactions, i.e. meaningful communicative actions of individuals aimed at the realization of certain goals. Similarities and differences between traditional communication in small groups and digital communication in communities in terms of the principles of information exchange are revealed. The similarities consist in the dialogical nature of communication, the presence of feedback and similar forms of communication. The differences consist in the characteristics of feedback (its indirectness and uncertainty), in the uncertainty of group boundaries (potential boundlessness of groups under the illusion of their boundedness) and hence the characteristics of the participants in the interaction.

Respublica LiterariaVol. 6(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Communication as a Factor in the Formation of User Identity — Margarita Bachilo · Respublica Literaria (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS