Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Adjuvant radiation for gynecologic malignancies often exposes organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder, to radiation, leading to toxicities that impact treatment tolerance and patient quality of life. Scanning proton beam therapy, particularly with Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO), may offer dosimetric and biological advantages over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study evaluates the clinical impact of IFSO-based proton planning in post-operative gynecologic cancer patients. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Fourteen patients receiving adjuvant proton therapy to 45 Gy in 25 fractions were retrospectively analyzed. Comparison VMAT plans were generated on the same datasets. Dose-volume metrics for key OARs and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared using paired statistical tests. Robustness evaluations accounted for setup and range uncertainties. <b>Results:</b> Proton plans significantly reduced dose to bone marrow (V10Gy: 58% vs. 86%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001; V20Gy: 47% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), small bowel (V20Gy: 21% vs. 56%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), and femoral heads (left femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.032; right femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.022). NTCP modeling predicted significantly lower rates of bowel urgency (9.4% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hematologic toxicity (10.2% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with proton therapy. Plans remained robust across uncertainty scenarios. <b>Conclusions:</b> IFSO-based scanning proton therapy provides clinically meaningful sparing of bone marrow and bowel, with the potential to reduce hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. These findings support its use in patients receiving adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, particularly those undergoing extended field treatment or chemotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Pamela R. Lemish, Jarrod M. Lentz, Pedro Lara, Rachel Ger et al.
1 citations
Cancers
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
2.01
article

Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Pamela R. Lemish, Jarrod M. Lentz, Pedro Lara, Rachel Ger, Danairis Hernandez Morales, Céline Schulz, Justin D. Gagneur, Justin D. Anderson, Ana K. Ridgway, Joshua S. Niedzielski, Martin Bues, Aman Anand, Sujay A. Vora, Christopher J. Kutyreff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Adjuvant radiation for gynecologic malignancies often exposes organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder, to radiation, leading to toxicities that impact treatment tolerance and patient quality of life. Scanning proton beam therapy, particularly with Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO), may offer dosimetric and biological advantages over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study evaluates the clinical impact of IFSO-based proton planning in post-operative gynecologic cancer patients. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Fourteen patients receiving adjuvant proton therapy to 45 Gy in 25 fractions were retrospectively analyzed. Comparison VMAT plans were generated on the same datasets. Dose-volume metrics for key OARs and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared using paired statistical tests. Robustness evaluations accounted for setup and range uncertainties. <b>Results:</b> Proton plans significantly reduced dose to bone marrow (V10Gy: 58% vs. 86%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001; V20Gy: 47% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), small bowel (V20Gy: 21% vs. 56%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), and femoral heads (left femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.032; right femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.022). NTCP modeling predicted significantly lower rates of bowel urgency (9.4% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hematologic toxicity (10.2% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with proton therapy. Plans remained robust across uncertainty scenarios. <b>Conclusions:</b> IFSO-based scanning proton therapy provides clinically meaningful sparing of bone marrow and bowel, with the potential to reduce hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. These findings support its use in patients receiving adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, particularly those undergoing extended field treatment or chemotherapy.

CancersVol. 17(12)
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), WinnMed (US), Cancer Care Northwest (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Baptist Health Louisville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.