Condensation and the Volatility Trend of the Earth

Abstract This article describes condensation of the elements and use of condensation temperatures to plot and interpret Earth’s apparent volatility trend. Major points covered include the following. (1) Updated 50% condensation temperatures (T 50 ) for all naturally occurring elements, Tc, and Pu are tabulated at 10 −2 to 10 −8 bar total pressure for solar composition material. (2) Condensation temperatures are mainly controlled by the Gibbs energy of condensation reactions and also by the Gibbs energy of ideal mixing if elements (compounds) condense in a solution. The additional Gibbs energy change due to non-ideal solution, i.e., activity coefficients ≠1, is a secondary effect. (3) The theoretically correct relationship between condensation temperature and fraction condensed ( $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) is derived from mass balance and chemical thermodynamic considerations. For major elements the condensation temperature is inversely proportional to log (1- $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). For trace elements dissolving in solid solution the condensation temperature is inversely proportional to log [(1- $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> )/ $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ]. (4) The maximum amount of element condensed per K −1 , i.e., the maximum in [d $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> /d(1/T)] is at the inflection point in the logistic (sigmoid) curve for an element, which is also at (or close to) the 50% condensation temperature. (5) Plots of normalized elemental abundances versus 50% condensation temperatures (volatility trends) are qualitative indicators of elemental fractionations due to volatility because they do not use the theoretically correct and quantitative relationship between condensation temperature and fraction condensed. (6) Volatility trend plots for average elemental abundances in CM, CO, CV, CR, H, L, LL, EH, EL chondrites show different “trends” for moderately and highly volatile elements, which may be linear, curved, a step function, or plateau. A comparison of three abundance sets for CM and CV chondrites shows trends depend on which elements are plotted, which data sources are used, and which temperature range is considered. (7) Proposed mechanisms for volatile element depletion in carbonaceous chondrites and the Earth are reviewed. (8) Some possible implications of volatile element abundances in the bulk silicate Earth are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Science Reviews
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-025-01182-6
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Condensation and the Volatility Trend of the Earth

Klaus Mezger, K. Lodders, D. S. Ebel, Bruce Fegley
5 citations
Space Science Reviews
Astro and Planetary Science
5.77
article

Condensation and the Volatility Trend of the Earth

Klaus Mezger, K. Lodders, D. S. Ebel, Bruce Fegley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article describes condensation of the elements and use of condensation temperatures to plot and interpret Earth’s apparent volatility trend. Major points covered include the following. (1) Updated 50% condensation temperatures (T 50 ) for all naturally occurring elements, Tc, and Pu are tabulated at 10 −2 to 10 −8 bar total pressure for solar composition material. (2) Condensation temperatures are mainly controlled by the Gibbs energy of condensation reactions and also by the Gibbs energy of ideal mixing if elements (compounds) condense in a solution. The additional Gibbs energy change due to non-ideal solution, i.e., activity coefficients ≠1, is a secondary effect. (3) The theoretically correct relationship between condensation temperature and fraction condensed ( $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) is derived from mass balance and chemical thermodynamic considerations. For major elements the condensation temperature is inversely proportional to log (1- $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). For trace elements dissolving in solid solution the condensation temperature is inversely proportional to log [(1- $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> )/ $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ]. (4) The maximum amount of element condensed per K −1 , i.e., the maximum in [d $\alpha _{\mathrm{M}}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> /d(1/T)] is at the inflection point in the logistic (sigmoid) curve for an element, which is also at (or close to) the 50% condensation temperature. (5) Plots of normalized elemental abundances versus 50% condensation temperatures (volatility trends) are qualitative indicators of elemental fractionations due to volatility because they do not use the theoretically correct and quantitative relationship between condensation temperature and fraction condensed. (6) Volatility trend plots for average elemental abundances in CM, CO, CV, CR, H, L, LL, EH, EL chondrites show different “trends” for moderately and highly volatile elements, which may be linear, curved, a step function, or plateau. A comparison of three abundance sets for CM and CV chondrites shows trends depend on which elements are plotted, which data sources are used, and which temperature range is considered. (7) Proposed mechanisms for volatile element depletion in carbonaceous chondrites and the Earth are reviewed. (8) Some possible implications of volatile element abundances in the bulk silicate Earth are discussed.

Space Science ReviewsVol. 221(5)
University of Bern (CH), Planetary Science Institute (US), American Museum of Natural History (US), Earth and Space Research (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Bern, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Astro and Planetary Science
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.