The Influence of Consumer Animosity, Religiosity, and Social Media Boycott Movements on The Purchase Decisions of Pro-Israel Fast Food Products, with Purchase Intention as an Intervening Variable (A Case Study on Generation Z University Students in B

In recent years, the escalating geopolitical conflict between Israel and Palestine has triggered waves of boycotts against products associated with support for Israel, including fast food brands. Generation Z students, as part of the younger consumer segment who are highly active on social media, demonstrate strong awareness of social and religious issues that influence their consumption preferences and behaviors. Therefore, it is important to understand how factors such as consumer animosity, religiosity, and social media-driven boycott movements influence purchase intentions and purchasing decisions of pro-Israel fast food products, particularly among Generation Z students in Banten Province. This study aims to analyze the influence of consumer animosity, religiosity, and boycott movements on social media on purchasing decisions, with purchase intention as a mediating variable. A quantitative approach with a descriptive method was employed. Data were collected through questionnaires developed based on indicators of each variable and measured using a Likert scale. The results show that consumer animosity does not significantly influence purchase intention (T-Statistic = 0.891 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.373 ≥ 0.05) nor purchasing decisions (T-Statistic = 1.264 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.206 ≥ 0.05). Similarly, religiosity does not significantly influence purchase intention (T-Statistic = 0.816 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.415 ≥ 0.05), but it has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. In contrast, boycott movements on social media significantly affect both purchase intention and purchasing decisions. Purchase intention mediates only the effect of boycott movements, not consumer animosity or religiosity. These findings offer valuable insights that can guide the development of targeted marketing strategies and effective social campaigns aimed at enhancing consumer awareness and promoting boycott initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of As Suadi.
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70691/assuadi.v2i1.1
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Consumer Animosity, Religiosity, and Social Media Boycott Movements on The Purchase Decisions of Pro-Israel Fast Food Products, with Purchase Intention as an Intervening Variable (A Case Study on Generation Z University Students in B

Syihabudin Syihabudin, Muhamad Fakhrudin, Qotrunnada Qotrunnada
International Journal of As Suadi.
Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
article

The Influence of Consumer Animosity, Religiosity, and Social Media Boycott Movements on The Purchase Decisions of Pro-Israel Fast Food Products, with Purchase Intention as an Intervening Variable (A Case Study on Generation Z University Students in B

Syihabudin Syihabudin, Muhamad Fakhrudin, Qotrunnada Qotrunnada
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the escalating geopolitical conflict between Israel and Palestine has triggered waves of boycotts against products associated with support for Israel, including fast food brands. Generation Z students, as part of the younger consumer segment who are highly active on social media, demonstrate strong awareness of social and religious issues that influence their consumption preferences and behaviors. Therefore, it is important to understand how factors such as consumer animosity, religiosity, and social media-driven boycott movements influence purchase intentions and purchasing decisions of pro-Israel fast food products, particularly among Generation Z students in Banten Province. This study aims to analyze the influence of consumer animosity, religiosity, and boycott movements on social media on purchasing decisions, with purchase intention as a mediating variable. A quantitative approach with a descriptive method was employed. Data were collected through questionnaires developed based on indicators of each variable and measured using a Likert scale. The results show that consumer animosity does not significantly influence purchase intention (T-Statistic = 0.891 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.373 ≥ 0.05) nor purchasing decisions (T-Statistic = 1.264 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.206 ≥ 0.05). Similarly, religiosity does not significantly influence purchase intention (T-Statistic = 0.816 ≤ 1.96; p-value = 0.415 ≥ 0.05), but it has a positive and significant effect on purchasing decisions. In contrast, boycott movements on social media significantly affect both purchase intention and purchasing decisions. Purchase intention mediates only the effect of boycott movements, not consumer animosity or religiosity. These findings offer valuable insights that can guide the development of targeted marketing strategies and effective social campaigns aimed at enhancing consumer awareness and promoting boycott initiatives.

International Journal of As Suadi.Vol. 2(1)
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Influence of Consumer Animosity, Religiosity, and Social Media Boycott Movements on The Purchase Decisions of Pro-Israel Fast Food Products, with Purchase Intention as an Intervening Variable (A Case Study on Generation Z University Students in B — Syihabudin Syihabudin, Muhamad Fakhrudin, et al. · International Journal of As Suadi. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS