Thought-Shaping, Reflection and the Refractive Element

Is it possible to think beyond the structuring and directing influences of thought-shaping? Or, phrased differently, how can thought-shaping be genuinely free and creative? My response in this essay is that we must move beyond the idea of thought-shaping as mere awareness or critical reflection. As I show, the notion of reflection itself has raised some philosophical issues of its own. Notably issues surrounding the limits of reason, the effective presence of biases, and overreliance on the notion of historical experience as they were transmitted from Kant to Hegel are critically discussed, with the aim of identifying a new direction to think about reflection. The development of reflection is examined via the thought of Gadamer, mainly through his hermeneutic conception of experience. After discussing these issues, I develop the notion of refraction, expanding on the concept as it was developed by Bergson. I explain how refraction relies on the appreciation of difference, thereby reorienting the entire field of thinking and overcoming the limitations inherent in the notion of reflection. This differentiating feature turns refraction into a creative and generative process. Concluding, I discuss how refraction supports free thinking by appealing to the notion of creative piety and the embrace as well as usage of limitations in thinking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and Realistic Reflection
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55121/prr.v1i1.278
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thought-Shaping, Reflection and the Refractive Element

Otto Paans
Philosophy and Realistic Reflection
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Thought-Shaping, Reflection and the Refractive Element

Otto Paans
article en

Abstract

Is it possible to think beyond the structuring and directing influences of thought-shaping? Or, phrased differently, how can thought-shaping be genuinely free and creative? My response in this essay is that we must move beyond the idea of thought-shaping as mere awareness or critical reflection. As I show, the notion of reflection itself has raised some philosophical issues of its own. Notably issues surrounding the limits of reason, the effective presence of biases, and overreliance on the notion of historical experience as they were transmitted from Kant to Hegel are critically discussed, with the aim of identifying a new direction to think about reflection. The development of reflection is examined via the thought of Gadamer, mainly through his hermeneutic conception of experience. After discussing these issues, I develop the notion of refraction, expanding on the concept as it was developed by Bergson. I explain how refraction relies on the appreciation of difference, thereby reorienting the entire field of thinking and overcoming the limitations inherent in the notion of reflection. This differentiating feature turns refraction into a creative and generative process. Concluding, I discuss how refraction supports free thinking by appealing to the notion of creative piety and the embrace as well as usage of limitations in thinking.

Philosophy and Realistic ReflectionVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.