PARP Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer—A Comparison of Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Therapy

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: PARP inhibitors (PARPis) currently play frontline roles in the management of prostate, pancreatic, ovarian and breast cancers, but their roles in colorectal cancer (CRC) management have yet to be clarified. Importantly, the specific predictive biomarkers for PARPis in CRC are still matters of investigations. The aim of this study is to identify the potential predictive biomarkers of PARP inhibition in CRC. <b>Methods</b>: Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEAs) and drug ontology enrichment analyses (DOEAs) of PARPi response gene sets were applied as the surrogates of PARPi response to two CRC cohorts in order to compare the predictive capacities of <i>TP53</i> mutation status, MSI status, as well as <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression for PARP inhibition to those of a homologous repair deficiency surrogate, and large-scale state transition (LST). Differential enrichment score (ES) and ontology enrichment (OE) analyses were used to interrogate the differential correlation of the predictive biomarkers with PARPi response, relative to LST. <b>Results</b>: The results demonstrated that LST-low, rather than LST-high, CRC subsets exhibited an enrichment of the PARPi response, in contrast to what has been established for other cancers. Furthermore, CRC subsets with wild-type <i>TP53</i>, positive MSI, as well as high <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression exhibited an enrichment of the PARPi response gene sets. Moreover, there was no differential enrichment of the PARPi response between LST and each of the MSI statuses, <i>PARP1</i> expression and <i>PARP2</i> expression. Furthermore, the preliminary differential enrichment observed between the LST-based and <i>TP53</i> mutation status-based PARPi responses could not be validated with further testing. <b>Conclusions</b>: MSI status, <i>TP53</i> mutation status as well as <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression may be substitutes for low LST as predictive biomarkers of PARPi response in CRC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18060905
Citations
1
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PARP Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer—A Comparison of Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Therapy

Abdulaziz Alfahed
1 citations
Pharmaceuticals
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
1.05
article

PARP Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer—A Comparison of Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Therapy

Abdulaziz Alfahed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: PARP inhibitors (PARPis) currently play frontline roles in the management of prostate, pancreatic, ovarian and breast cancers, but their roles in colorectal cancer (CRC) management have yet to be clarified. Importantly, the specific predictive biomarkers for PARPis in CRC are still matters of investigations. The aim of this study is to identify the potential predictive biomarkers of PARP inhibition in CRC. <b>Methods</b>: Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEAs) and drug ontology enrichment analyses (DOEAs) of PARPi response gene sets were applied as the surrogates of PARPi response to two CRC cohorts in order to compare the predictive capacities of <i>TP53</i> mutation status, MSI status, as well as <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression for PARP inhibition to those of a homologous repair deficiency surrogate, and large-scale state transition (LST). Differential enrichment score (ES) and ontology enrichment (OE) analyses were used to interrogate the differential correlation of the predictive biomarkers with PARPi response, relative to LST. <b>Results</b>: The results demonstrated that LST-low, rather than LST-high, CRC subsets exhibited an enrichment of the PARPi response, in contrast to what has been established for other cancers. Furthermore, CRC subsets with wild-type <i>TP53</i>, positive MSI, as well as high <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression exhibited an enrichment of the PARPi response gene sets. Moreover, there was no differential enrichment of the PARPi response between LST and each of the MSI statuses, <i>PARP1</i> expression and <i>PARP2</i> expression. Furthermore, the preliminary differential enrichment observed between the LST-based and <i>TP53</i> mutation status-based PARPi responses could not be validated with further testing. <b>Conclusions</b>: MSI status, <i>TP53</i> mutation status as well as <i>PARP1</i> and <i>PARP2</i> expression may be substitutes for low LST as predictive biomarkers of PARPi response in CRC.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(6)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.