Artificial intelligence-driven classification method of grapevine major phenological stages using conventional RGB imaging

Accurate monitoring of grapevine phenological stages is essential for optimising vineyard management. This study evaluates the performance of three deep learning architectures (ResNet-34, YOLOv11-Classification and Vision Transformer (ViT)) for automated classification of vineyard canopy images into four key phenological stages: i) Shoot and inflorescence development (E-L 12–18), ii) Flowering (E-L 19–26), iii) Berry formation (E-L 27–33), and iv) Berry ripening (E-L 35–38). These categories correspond to broad developmental periods that may span several E-L stages. A dataset comprising 4,381 images was used to train and validate the models, incorporating data augmentation techniques to improve robustness. Results indicate that all three models achieved high classification accuracy, with ResNet-34 obtaining the highest accuracy (97.4 % validation, 95.6 % test), reinforcing its strong feature extraction capabilities. However, its lower F1-score (95.3 % validation, 91.8 % test) suggests challenges in handling class imbalances. YOLOv11-Classification demonstrated the most balanced classification performance, achieving a high F1-score (93.6 % validation, 91.8 % test) while maintaining the fastest training time, making it particularly suitable for real-time applications. ViT exhibited competitive classification performance but had higher computational demands, limiting its feasibility for real-time vineyard monitoring. A confusion matrix analysis highlighted misclassification trends, particularly between early shoot development and flowering, due to their visual similarities. Despite these challenges, the study confirms that AI models can effectively automate vineyard phenology classification, reducing manual assessment efforts, and contributing to more efficient viticultural decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OENO One
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2025.59.2.9306
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence-driven classification method of grapevine major phenological stages using conventional RGB imaging

Javier Tardáguila, Rubén Íñiguez, Ignacio Barrio, Carlos Poblete-Echeverría et al.
OENO One
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Artificial intelligence-driven classification method of grapevine major phenological stages using conventional RGB imaging

Javier Tardáguila, Rubén Íñiguez, Ignacio Barrio, Carlos Poblete-Echeverría, Talitha Venter, Fikile Wolela, Maria Ignacia González Pavez
article en

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of grapevine phenological stages is essential for optimising vineyard management. This study evaluates the performance of three deep learning architectures (ResNet-34, YOLOv11-Classification and Vision Transformer (ViT)) for automated classification of vineyard canopy images into four key phenological stages: i) Shoot and inflorescence development (E-L 12–18), ii) Flowering (E-L 19–26), iii) Berry formation (E-L 27–33), and iv) Berry ripening (E-L 35–38). These categories correspond to broad developmental periods that may span several E-L stages. A dataset comprising 4,381 images was used to train and validate the models, incorporating data augmentation techniques to improve robustness. Results indicate that all three models achieved high classification accuracy, with ResNet-34 obtaining the highest accuracy (97.4 % validation, 95.6 % test), reinforcing its strong feature extraction capabilities. However, its lower F1-score (95.3 % validation, 91.8 % test) suggests challenges in handling class imbalances. YOLOv11-Classification demonstrated the most balanced classification performance, achieving a high F1-score (93.6 % validation, 91.8 % test) while maintaining the fastest training time, making it particularly suitable for real-time applications. ViT exhibited competitive classification performance but had higher computational demands, limiting its feasibility for real-time vineyard monitoring. A confusion matrix analysis highlighted misclassification trends, particularly between early shoot development and flowering, due to their visual similarities. Despite these challenges, the study confirms that AI models can effectively automate vineyard phenology classification, reducing manual assessment efforts, and contributing to more efficient viticultural decision-making.

OENO OneVol. 59(2)
University of Talca (CL), Universidad de La Rioja (ES), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Gobierno de La Rioja (ES)
Universidad de Talca, Universidad de La Rioja
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.