Maximal aerobic power and anaerobic power reserves to prescribe cycling interval training sessions
HIIT based on APR and GPR does not reduce inter-individual variability in physiological responses and tolerance compared with MAP-based prescription. This suggests that both APR and GPR fail to accurately differentiate between the aerobic and anaerobic characteristics of an athlete, hindering the normalization of exercise responses during HIIT.
Authors
- Emanuela Faelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-8021)
- Luca Filipas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-9626)
- Gabriele Gallo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5481-7003)
- Andrea Meloni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-406X)
- Piero Ruggeri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-1489)
- Simone Di Gennaro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4439-6846)
- Marco Panascì (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-2378)
- Roberto Codella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-1899)
Institutions
- Total (France) (FR)
- University of Milan (IT)
- MultiMedica (IT)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- University of Genoa (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.25.16693-0
- Primary Topic
- Sports Performance and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00