Smart Cities and Affective-Symbolic Urbanism: A Dual Tourist/Resident Perspective

This study examines how individuals engage with smart city technologies (SCTs) through the dual roles of residents and tourists. Drawing on a new conceptual framework of affective-symbolic engagement, it explores not only adoption patterns but also users’ emotional responses and perceived inclusion. A quantitative analysis of 194 respondents reveals that while adoption rates are similar across roles, residents and tourists differ in usage routines, usability experiences, and sensitivity to symbolic cues. Tourists report more interface challenges and rely on third-party sources, while residents engage more with civic platforms. Age predicts usability barriers, but education does not significantly affect engagement. Emotional comfort and symbolic belonging are shaped less by demographic background and more by situational role and perceived design inclusivity. The findings extend smart city theory by incorporating role-sensitive, affective, and symbolic dimensions of digital engagement and support policies aimed at inclusive, human-centered urban technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tourism and Hospitality
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6020116
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart Cities and Affective-Symbolic Urbanism: A Dual Tourist/Resident Perspective

Nikolaos Iason Koufodontis, Stella Zounta, Εleni Gaki
Tourism and Hospitality
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Smart Cities and Affective-Symbolic Urbanism: A Dual Tourist/Resident Perspective

Nikolaos Iason Koufodontis, Stella Zounta, Εleni Gaki
article en

Abstract

This study examines how individuals engage with smart city technologies (SCTs) through the dual roles of residents and tourists. Drawing on a new conceptual framework of affective-symbolic engagement, it explores not only adoption patterns but also users’ emotional responses and perceived inclusion. A quantitative analysis of 194 respondents reveals that while adoption rates are similar across roles, residents and tourists differ in usage routines, usability experiences, and sensitivity to symbolic cues. Tourists report more interface challenges and rely on third-party sources, while residents engage more with civic platforms. Age predicts usability barriers, but education does not significantly affect engagement. Emotional comfort and symbolic belonging are shaped less by demographic background and more by situational role and perceived design inclusivity. The findings extend smart city theory by incorporating role-sensitive, affective, and symbolic dimensions of digital engagement and support policies aimed at inclusive, human-centered urban technologies.

Tourism and HospitalityVol. 6(2)
University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smart Cities and Affective-Symbolic Urbanism: A Dual Tourist/Resident Perspective — Nikolaos Iason Koufodontis, Stella Zounta, et al. · Tourism and Hospitality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS