What can lithics tell us about demography: people are not rocks (nor dates)

Abstract Lithic technology coevolves with economic systems of supply and processing, mobility and land use strategies, social learning, and public signaling. In turn, that package of cultural practices co‐evolves with population size and ecosystem operation. Hence, lithic technology is indirectly and variably associated with population size. Lithic artifacts have been used as a proxy for population size, but we argue those coevolutionary interactions do not produce fixed relationships between numbers of people and the number of lithic artifacts (or dates) produced. This conclusion leads us to be critical of the kinds of demographic proxies commonly being used in archaeology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeometry
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.70005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What can lithics tell us about demography: people are not rocks (nor dates)

Kim Sterelny, Peter Hiscock
1 citations
Archaeometry
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
4.33
article

What can lithics tell us about demography: people are not rocks (nor dates)

Kim Sterelny, Peter Hiscock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lithic technology coevolves with economic systems of supply and processing, mobility and land use strategies, social learning, and public signaling. In turn, that package of cultural practices co‐evolves with population size and ecosystem operation. Hence, lithic technology is indirectly and variably associated with population size. Lithic artifacts have been used as a proxy for population size, but we argue those coevolutionary interactions do not produce fixed relationships between numbers of people and the number of lithic artifacts (or dates) produced. This conclusion leads us to be critical of the kinds of demographic proxies commonly being used in archaeology.

Archaeometry
Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.