Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (T-QNCQ)

Objective: The Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (QNCQ) has been widely used to assess nurses’ perceptions of care quality. However, there was a lack of studies validating the QNCQ in Thai healthcare settings, highlighting the need for its adaptation. This study aimed to translate the QNCQ into Thai and evaluate its internal consistency and psychometric properties. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used in this research. The Thai version (T-QNCQ) was a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 38 items across 5 response categories, covering 6 dimensions: physical environment, staff characteristics, preconditions, task-oriented activities, human-oriented activities, and patient outcomes. A sample of 380 registered nurses from tertiary government hospitals in Thailand was recruited using purposive and convenience sampling. To assess the validity of the translated scale, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), descriptive statistics, and reliability testing were conducted. Results: The T-QNCQ demonstrated strong reliability and validity. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.98, with subscale values ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. Item-total correlations for the overall scale were positive, ranging from 0.61 to 0.84. Construct validity was supported by CFA, which yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index=0.95, Tucker-Lewis index=0.94, root mean square error of approximation=0.05, and standardized root mean square residual=0.04. Conclusion: The T-QNCQ was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses’ perceptions of care quality in Thai healthcare settings. These results provide valuable insights for nurse administrators and policymakers, aiding improvements in care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20251228
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (T-QNCQ)

Vachira Posai, Teeraporn Sathira-Angkura, Uraiporn Janta-um-mou, Patcharee Kladjomphong et al.
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (T-QNCQ)

Vachira Posai, Teeraporn Sathira-Angkura, Uraiporn Janta-um-mou, Patcharee Kladjomphong, Supisara Phonkrut, Niphon Watada, Supitcha Udomchai, Armarapas Atthachaiwat, Kanogporn Jamsomboon
article en

Abstract

Objective: The Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (QNCQ) has been widely used to assess nurses’ perceptions of care quality. However, there was a lack of studies validating the QNCQ in Thai healthcare settings, highlighting the need for its adaptation. This study aimed to translate the QNCQ into Thai and evaluate its internal consistency and psychometric properties. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used in this research. The Thai version (T-QNCQ) was a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 38 items across 5 response categories, covering 6 dimensions: physical environment, staff characteristics, preconditions, task-oriented activities, human-oriented activities, and patient outcomes. A sample of 380 registered nurses from tertiary government hospitals in Thailand was recruited using purposive and convenience sampling. To assess the validity of the translated scale, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), descriptive statistics, and reliability testing were conducted. Results: The T-QNCQ demonstrated strong reliability and validity. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.98, with subscale values ranging from 0.86 to 0.94. Item-total correlations for the overall scale were positive, ranging from 0.61 to 0.84. Construct validity was supported by CFA, which yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index=0.95, Tucker-Lewis index=0.94, root mean square error of approximation=0.05, and standardized root mean square residual=0.04. Conclusion: The T-QNCQ was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses’ perceptions of care quality in Thai healthcare settings. These results provide valuable insights for nurse administrators and policymakers, aiding improvements in care delivery.

Journal of Health Science and Medical Research
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.