Reward Choices: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Task Performance

This study examines the effect of a tangible reward choice in task settings that require varyinglevels of cognitive effort from participants. We employ a laboratory experiment in which we manipulateboth the availability of a reward choice (i.e., participants either choose among a set of tangible rewards orthey are assigned one), and task difficulty (i.e., a simple task versus a more cognitively demanding task).Drawing on insights from behavioral economics we predict that reward choice and task difficulty interactsuch that reward choice, compared to no reward choice, increases task performance more in cognitivelydemanding tasks than in simpler tasks. Our results are consistent with this prediction. Consistent withour theory, we find that reward choice, compared to no choice, enables individuals to align their rewardselection with their preferences. This preference matching mediates the relationship between reward choiceand task performance, but only in cognitively demanding tasks. We contribute to the literature on incentivesby demonstrating that offering a choice of rewards can enhance task performance, particularly in tasks thatrequire greater cognitive effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Accounting Review
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2025.2504438
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reward Choices: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Task Performance

Alexandra Van den Abbeele, Eddy Cardinaels, Liliana Dewaele
European Accounting Review
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Reward Choices: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Task Performance

Alexandra Van den Abbeele, Eddy Cardinaels, Liliana Dewaele
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effect of a tangible reward choice in task settings that require varyinglevels of cognitive effort from participants. We employ a laboratory experiment in which we manipulateboth the availability of a reward choice (i.e., participants either choose among a set of tangible rewards orthey are assigned one), and task difficulty (i.e., a simple task versus a more cognitively demanding task).Drawing on insights from behavioral economics we predict that reward choice and task difficulty interactsuch that reward choice, compared to no reward choice, increases task performance more in cognitivelydemanding tasks than in simpler tasks. Our results are consistent with this prediction. Consistent withour theory, we find that reward choice, compared to no choice, enables individuals to align their rewardselection with their preferences. This preference matching mediates the relationship between reward choiceand task performance, but only in cognitively demanding tasks. We contribute to the literature on incentivesby demonstrating that offering a choice of rewards can enhance task performance, particularly in tasks thatrequire greater cognitive effort.

European Accounting ReviewVol. 35(1)
Tilburg University (NL), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.