THE TRANSLATION OF THE MISCELLANY KRINY SELNYE INTO RUSSIAN AND ITS TRANSLATORS

The article analyzes the principles of the Russian translation of the seventeenth-century moral and ascetic miscellany Kriny selnye (Lilies of the Field). The text was translated by the Athonite hieromonk Feofan (Kharitonov), while the schema monk Khrisanf (Potapiev) supervised the publication of this translation in Odessa in 1905. Besides coping with the usual editorial and translation issues, the translator and the publisher faced the need to adapt the original ascetic instructions for twentieth-century readers. Moreover, they had to deal with some theological issues related to the practice of Jesus Prayer. The theological statements that required correction in the Russian edition turned out to be close to the teachings of advocates of onomatodoxy, which began spreading on Mount Athos several years later. Possibly the work on the Kriny selnye prompted the hieromonk Feofan and the schema monk Khrisanf to become the most important critics of onomatodoxy among the inhabitants of the Athos monasteries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2025-1-177-193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE TRANSLATION OF THE MISCELLANY KRINY SELNYE INTO RUSSIAN AND ITS TRANSLATORS

Nikolai V. Solodov
1 citations
Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies
Language and Culture
6.13
article

THE TRANSLATION OF THE MISCELLANY KRINY SELNYE INTO RUSSIAN AND ITS TRANSLATORS

Nikolai V. Solodov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article analyzes the principles of the Russian translation of the seventeenth-century moral and ascetic miscellany Kriny selnye (Lilies of the Field). The text was translated by the Athonite hieromonk Feofan (Kharitonov), while the schema monk Khrisanf (Potapiev) supervised the publication of this translation in Odessa in 1905. Besides coping with the usual editorial and translation issues, the translator and the publisher faced the need to adapt the original ascetic instructions for twentieth-century readers. Moreover, they had to deal with some theological issues related to the practice of Jesus Prayer. The theological statements that required correction in the Russian edition turned out to be close to the teachings of advocates of onomatodoxy, which began spreading on Mount Athos several years later. Possibly the work on the Kriny selnye prompted the hieromonk Feofan and the schema monk Khrisanf to become the most important critics of onomatodoxy among the inhabitants of the Athos monasteries.

Texts and History Journal of Philological Historical and Cultural Texts and History StudiesVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language and Culture
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.