Evaluation of Knowledge Management Maturity at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Solutions for its Improvement: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Objective This study aims to evaluate the Knowledge Management Maturity (KMM) and to provide solutions for its improvement at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) in Iran. Methods This quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. Two hundred and ten experts in knowledge management completed the standard evaluation tool to assess knowledge management maturity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten managers. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel 2013, while qualitative data were examined using framework analysis with MAXQDA 10. Results Knowledge management maturity was assessed at Level 3 (Expansion) with a score of 135.2. Technology scored the highest (21.6), while leadership scored the lowest (18.44). To enhance knowledge management, solutions were identified across the dimensions of leadership (collaborative management, culture building, implementation of motivational systems, executive regulations, and guidelines), people (training and empowerment of managers and staff, merit-based selection), technology (quantitative and qualitative development of IT infrastructure), and process (identification, creation, storage, sharing, and use of knowledge). Conclusion The solutions proposed in this study can be utilized to structure the stages of maturity, planning, and policymaking in knowledge management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Public Health Journal
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445395036250612102214
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Knowledge Management Maturity at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Solutions for its Improvement: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Narjes Alsadat Nasabi, Najmeh Bordbar, Rahmanpour Mohammad
The Open Public Health Journal
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Evaluation of Knowledge Management Maturity at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Solutions for its Improvement: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Narjes Alsadat Nasabi, Najmeh Bordbar, Rahmanpour Mohammad
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the Knowledge Management Maturity (KMM) and to provide solutions for its improvement at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) in Iran. Methods This quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in 2022. Two hundred and ten experts in knowledge management completed the standard evaluation tool to assess knowledge management maturity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten managers. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel 2013, while qualitative data were examined using framework analysis with MAXQDA 10. Results Knowledge management maturity was assessed at Level 3 (Expansion) with a score of 135.2. Technology scored the highest (21.6), while leadership scored the lowest (18.44). To enhance knowledge management, solutions were identified across the dimensions of leadership (collaborative management, culture building, implementation of motivational systems, executive regulations, and guidelines), people (training and empowerment of managers and staff, merit-based selection), technology (quantitative and qualitative development of IT infrastructure), and process (identification, creation, storage, sharing, and use of knowledge). Conclusion The solutions proposed in this study can be utilized to structure the stages of maturity, planning, and policymaking in knowledge management.

The Open Public Health JournalVol. 18(1)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.