Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study

<b>Background</b>: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. <b>Results</b>: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (<i>n</i> = 67) or pCRC (<i>n</i> = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4-26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (<i>p</i> = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.99). <b>Conclusions</b>: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122014
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study

Elizabeth Gleeson, David Shibata, Paxton V. Dickson, Jeremiah L. Deneve et al.
2 links
Cancers
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study

Elizabeth Gleeson, David Shibata, Paxton V. Dickson, Jeremiah L. Deneve, Kristen Dougherty, Ian Solsky, Jaewon J. Lee, Leah E. Hendrick, Andrew M. Fleming, J Raine, Evan S. Glazer, O Clark, Gitonga Munene
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. <b>Results</b>: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (<i>n</i> = 67) or pCRC (<i>n</i> = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4-26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (<i>p</i> = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.99). <b>Conclusions</b>: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.

CancersVol. 17(12)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Western Michigan University (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Health Science Center, University of Tennessee
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.