Clinical and Gut Microbiome Characteristics of Medically Complex Patients Receiving Blenderized Tube Feeds vs. Standard Enteral Feeds

<b>Background:</b> Diet is known to influence the composition of the gut microbiome. For patients who require enteral feeding, there has been a growing popularity of using blenderized tube feeds (BTFs) as an alternative to standard enteral formula (SEF). There is limited literature exploring the impact of BTFs on the gut microbiome. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-eight patients 1 to 22 years of age who received their nutrition via gastrostomy tube for over 4 weeks were included and participants were divided into BTF and SEF groups. Demographics and clinical information were collected from the medical records, and all legal guardians completed a semi-structured interview using a questionnaire. 16SrRNA sequencing was used for bacteriome analysis. <b>Results:</b> Eleven patients in the BTF group and seventeen in the SEF group were included. No significant differences in the demographics were noted. Patients on BTFs had no emesis compared to seven (41%) in the SEF group, <i>p</i> = 0.02. There were no significant differences in other clinical characteristics and comorbidities. No significant differences in the gut microbiome between the groups were noted for alpha and beta diversities, richness, and evenness (at both genus and species levels). Differential abundance analysis showed only a few significant differences between the groups at all reported taxonomic levels. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients on BTFs had a significantly decreased prevalence of emesis compared to the SEF group. No significant differences in the microbiome between the groups were noted for alpha and beta diversities, richness, and evenness. Prospective studies are recommended to verify our preliminary data and further evaluate the implications of our study results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17122018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Gut Microbiome Characteristics of Medically Complex Patients Receiving Blenderized Tube Feeds vs. Standard Enteral Feeds

Aravind Thavamani, Erin Marie D. San Valentin, Mahmoud Ghannoum, Senthilkumar Sankararaman et al.
1 citations
Nutrients
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
article

Clinical and Gut Microbiome Characteristics of Medically Complex Patients Receiving Blenderized Tube Feeds vs. Standard Enteral Feeds

Aravind Thavamani, Erin Marie D. San Valentin, Mahmoud Ghannoum, Senthilkumar Sankararaman, Thomas J. Sferra, Miquel Ferrer, Mauricio Retuerto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Diet is known to influence the composition of the gut microbiome. For patients who require enteral feeding, there has been a growing popularity of using blenderized tube feeds (BTFs) as an alternative to standard enteral formula (SEF). There is limited literature exploring the impact of BTFs on the gut microbiome. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-eight patients 1 to 22 years of age who received their nutrition via gastrostomy tube for over 4 weeks were included and participants were divided into BTF and SEF groups. Demographics and clinical information were collected from the medical records, and all legal guardians completed a semi-structured interview using a questionnaire. 16SrRNA sequencing was used for bacteriome analysis. <b>Results:</b> Eleven patients in the BTF group and seventeen in the SEF group were included. No significant differences in the demographics were noted. Patients on BTFs had no emesis compared to seven (41%) in the SEF group, <i>p</i> = 0.02. There were no significant differences in other clinical characteristics and comorbidities. No significant differences in the gut microbiome between the groups were noted for alpha and beta diversities, richness, and evenness (at both genus and species levels). Differential abundance analysis showed only a few significant differences between the groups at all reported taxonomic levels. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients on BTFs had a significantly decreased prevalence of emesis compared to the SEF group. No significant differences in the microbiome between the groups were noted for alpha and beta diversities, richness, and evenness. Prospective studies are recommended to verify our preliminary data and further evaluate the implications of our study results.

NutrientsVol. 17(12)
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US), University School (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.