Practice as Research Methodology in the Creative Arts: A Systematic Literature Review

Scientific research, with its emphasis on objectivity, rationality, and principles such as experimental verification, repeatability, and falsification, often falls short in capturing the subjective and fluid knowledge derived from lived experiences. In contrast, the “Practice as Research” (PaR) methodology embraces experiential modes of knowing, including tacit knowledge, embodied cognition, and performative understanding, fostering the generation and dissemination of new insights through practice. However, despite its focus on practice, PaR remains theoretically under-explored as an emerging methodology, necessitating further investigation into its conceptual foundations. This review identifies the need to establish artistic practice as a rigorous and systematic form of inquiry within academic research. The study applies PRISMA, ensuring the creative and interpretive nature of the inquiry is grounded in a transparent and structured review methodology. Drawing on 25 qualitative articles sourced from three databases (Taylor and Francis Online, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), this study demonstrates how artistic inquiry through the creative process, multi-modal epistemologies, performative paradigms, and theorizing practice can produce substantial new insights and effectively communicate them within academic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PaperAsia
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v41i3b.540
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice as Research Methodology in the Creative Arts: A Systematic Literature Review

Mengmeng Jia, Safrizal Shahir
PaperAsia
Artistic and Creative Research
article

Practice as Research Methodology in the Creative Arts: A Systematic Literature Review

Mengmeng Jia, Safrizal Shahir
article en

Abstract

Scientific research, with its emphasis on objectivity, rationality, and principles such as experimental verification, repeatability, and falsification, often falls short in capturing the subjective and fluid knowledge derived from lived experiences. In contrast, the “Practice as Research” (PaR) methodology embraces experiential modes of knowing, including tacit knowledge, embodied cognition, and performative understanding, fostering the generation and dissemination of new insights through practice. However, despite its focus on practice, PaR remains theoretically under-explored as an emerging methodology, necessitating further investigation into its conceptual foundations. This review identifies the need to establish artistic practice as a rigorous and systematic form of inquiry within academic research. The study applies PRISMA, ensuring the creative and interpretive nature of the inquiry is grounded in a transparent and structured review methodology. Drawing on 25 qualitative articles sourced from three databases (Taylor and Francis Online, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), this study demonstrates how artistic inquiry through the creative process, multi-modal epistemologies, performative paradigms, and theorizing practice can produce substantial new insights and effectively communicate them within academic contexts.

PaperAsiaVol. 41(3b)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Hainan Normal University (CN)
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Artistic and Creative Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.