Convergent Validity of the Fine Motor, Speech, and Cognitive Domains of the 5-Domain Niemann-Pick Disease Type C Clinical Severity Scale

The 5-Domain Niemann Pick Type C Clinical Severity Scale (5DNPCCSS) is used in clinical practice and trials. Although psychometric data support the clinical meaningfulness of the concepts and the scale's interrater reliability, more information is needed to support its construct validity. Here, we evaluated the convergent validity of the Cognition, Speech, and Fine Motor domains. Data from 121 individuals with Niemann-Pick disease type C were drawn from several studies conducted at 2 US sites. Direct standardized assessments included the Nine-Hole pegboard or Purdue pegboard, a portion of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, and the age-appropriate Wechsler IQ test or the Mullen Scales of Early Learning. The 5DNPCCSS domains were significantly related in the expected directions to their respective direct assessments, supporting their construct validity. In combination with previous evidence presented for the Ambulation and Swallow domains, these results support the fitness of purpose of the (5DNPCCSS for clinical studies in Niemann-Pick disease type C. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00344331, NCT01747135, NCT02534844.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Neurology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738251346348
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Convergent Validity of the Fine Motor, Speech, and Cognitive Domains of the 5-Domain Niemann-Pick Disease Type C Clinical Severity Scale

Derek Alexander, Anne Hoffmann, Elizabeth Berry‐Kravis, Nicole Y. Farhat et al.
1 citations
Journal of Child Neurology
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
1.16
article

Convergent Validity of the Fine Motor, Speech, and Cognitive Domains of the 5-Domain Niemann-Pick Disease Type C Clinical Severity Scale

Derek Alexander, Anne Hoffmann, Elizabeth Berry‐Kravis, Nicole Y. Farhat, Monica Lewis, Audrey Thurm, Lisa Joseph, Kenneth E. Robbins, Cristan Farmer, Simona Bianconi, Ivy Giserman‐Kiss, Forbes D. Porter, Orsolya K. Albert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The 5-Domain Niemann Pick Type C Clinical Severity Scale (5DNPCCSS) is used in clinical practice and trials. Although psychometric data support the clinical meaningfulness of the concepts and the scale's interrater reliability, more information is needed to support its construct validity. Here, we evaluated the convergent validity of the Cognition, Speech, and Fine Motor domains. Data from 121 individuals with Niemann-Pick disease type C were drawn from several studies conducted at 2 US sites. Direct standardized assessments included the Nine-Hole pegboard or Purdue pegboard, a portion of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, and the age-appropriate Wechsler IQ test or the Mullen Scales of Early Learning. The 5DNPCCSS domains were significantly related in the expected directions to their respective direct assessments, supporting their construct validity. In combination with previous evidence presented for the Ambulation and Swallow domains, these results support the fitness of purpose of the (5DNPCCSS for clinical studies in Niemann-Pick disease type C. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00344331, NCT01747135, NCT02534844.

Journal of Child NeurologyVol. 41(1)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.