Digital harms and penalties: Australian regulation, platform moderation and the figure of the perpetrator

The Australian regulatory framework that relates to the management of contemporary online harms emphasises the role of platforms in managing and policing infractions and has legislated civil penalties for their non-compliance. Although importantly shifting responsibility towards previously-exempt platforms, this approach contrasts with earlier regulatory options in which individual perpetrators were subject to penalties for harms they cause to others. This article discusses the regulatory framework, and the ways in which management the outsourcing to platforms of harm management not only foregoes procedural justice and due process but misses an opportunity to shape digital citizenship through the potential pedagogies of emphasising a penal regime. We analyse platform penalisation practices and present data from a survey of Australians that demonstrates public support for government penalties for perpetrators. We argue that extending the framework to penalise perpetrators in Australia not only aligns penalisation with remedial and restorative justice approaches, but helps shape community standards and expectations for safe online behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media International Australia
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x251350727
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital harms and penalties: Australian regulation, platform moderation and the figure of the perpetrator

Rhyle Simcock, Rob Cover, J. O’Neal Humphries
1 citations
Media International Australia
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
3.25
article

Digital harms and penalties: Australian regulation, platform moderation and the figure of the perpetrator

Rhyle Simcock, Rob Cover, J. O’Neal Humphries
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Australian regulatory framework that relates to the management of contemporary online harms emphasises the role of platforms in managing and policing infractions and has legislated civil penalties for their non-compliance. Although importantly shifting responsibility towards previously-exempt platforms, this approach contrasts with earlier regulatory options in which individual perpetrators were subject to penalties for harms they cause to others. This article discusses the regulatory framework, and the ways in which management the outsourcing to platforms of harm management not only foregoes procedural justice and due process but misses an opportunity to shape digital citizenship through the potential pedagogies of emphasising a penal regime. We analyse platform penalisation practices and present data from a survey of Australians that demonstrates public support for government penalties for perpetrators. We argue that extending the framework to penalise perpetrators in Australia not only aligns penalisation with remedial and restorative justice approaches, but helps shape community standards and expectations for safe online behaviour.

Media International Australia
Queensland University of Technology (AU), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital harms and penalties: Australian regulation, platform moderation and the figure of the perpetrator — Rhyle Simcock, Rob Cover, et al. · Media International Australia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS