Is GP practice bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening coverage correlated with GP practice list inflation?

ObjectiveGP list inflation occurs when the number of patients registered at a GP practice exceeds the number of residents. It may be associated with out-of-date patient contact data, affecting invitations for cancer screening. We examined whether bowel, breast and cervical screening coverage was associated with list inflation after adjusting for deprivation and ethnicity.MethodsWe used ecological data, with GP practice the unit of analysis. Outcomes were NHS Fingertips 2019-2020 screening programme performance data. List inflation/deflation was calculated as the difference between GP-registered patients in July 2021 and Office for National Statistics population estimates in their Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA). Percentage White population was calculated using census (2021) data. Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) score was available from NHS Fingertips. Linear regression models were used to examine correlations between outcomes and list inflation before and after adjustment for deprivation and ethnicity.ResultsThe study included 6085 GP practices covering the whole of England. Median list inflation was 8.6% (interquartile range (IQR) 4.7%-16.9%). List inflation was a significant independent predictor of screening coverage. For each 10 percentage points increase in list inflation, coverage declined as follows: -1.96% (95% CI: -2.19, -1.73), -2.20% (95% CI: -2.39, -2.02), -0.99% (95% CI: -1.15, -0.84) and -1.59% (95% CI: -1.75, -1.43) for breast, cervical (aged 25-49), cervical (aged 50-64) and bowel cancer screening, respectively.ConclusionsIt is important to control for variations in list inflation as well as population demographics when comparing screening programme coverage. Uptake improvement initiatives should include strategies for overcoming issues with out-of-date registration data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251347408
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is GP practice bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening coverage correlated with GP practice list inflation?

Cathryn Hudson, Sue Hudson
Journal of Medical Screening
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Is GP practice bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening coverage correlated with GP practice list inflation?

Cathryn Hudson, Sue Hudson
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveGP list inflation occurs when the number of patients registered at a GP practice exceeds the number of residents. It may be associated with out-of-date patient contact data, affecting invitations for cancer screening. We examined whether bowel, breast and cervical screening coverage was associated with list inflation after adjusting for deprivation and ethnicity.MethodsWe used ecological data, with GP practice the unit of analysis. Outcomes were NHS Fingertips 2019-2020 screening programme performance data. List inflation/deflation was calculated as the difference between GP-registered patients in July 2021 and Office for National Statistics population estimates in their Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA). Percentage White population was calculated using census (2021) data. Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) score was available from NHS Fingertips. Linear regression models were used to examine correlations between outcomes and list inflation before and after adjustment for deprivation and ethnicity.ResultsThe study included 6085 GP practices covering the whole of England. Median list inflation was 8.6% (interquartile range (IQR) 4.7%-16.9%). List inflation was a significant independent predictor of screening coverage. For each 10 percentage points increase in list inflation, coverage declined as follows: -1.96% (95% CI: -2.19, -1.73), -2.20% (95% CI: -2.39, -2.02), -0.99% (95% CI: -1.15, -0.84) and -1.59% (95% CI: -1.75, -1.43) for breast, cervical (aged 25-49), cervical (aged 50-64) and bowel cancer screening, respectively.ConclusionsIt is important to control for variations in list inflation as well as population demographics when comparing screening programme coverage. Uptake improvement initiatives should include strategies for overcoming issues with out-of-date registration data.

Journal of Medical ScreeningVol. 33(1)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.