A comparative study of deepfake facial manipulation technique using generative adversarial networks

Abstract The manipulation of digital images has become a popular trend. Due to the development of image processing tools and visualization techniques integrating deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms (in particular generative adversarial networks–GAN), this can pose serious threats to privacy and security. In recent years, Deepfake algorithms have been designed to exchange faces or modify facial features, potentially leading to more severe problems in this context. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of the two most important facial image processing technologies: (i) deepfake face manipulation; and (ii) face manipulation detection techniques. Furthermore, we explore the state-of-the-art of popular GAN techniques. In particular, three types of Deepfake face detection technologies are reviewed: (i) hand-crafted features (ii) artifacts; and (iii) learning-based features, while highlighting related improvements and challenges. Furthermore, this article discusses potential challenges and promising research directions for future investigation. We believe that this review has been organized to provide a structured analysis of important research papers and to discuss each study’s main findings and conclusions. Our investigation reveals shortcomings in manipulation detection benchmarks due to real-world scenario variations and biased dataset comparisons. Current research priorities revolve around enhancing GAN training stability, resolution, and manipulable facial features. Moreover, GANs have shown superior results in identifying fake images; however, their reliance prompts a systematic approach to detecting fakes. This dependency raises questions about detecting fake images with or without manipulated GAN architecture, urging the need for novel computational techniques to identify manipulations without GAN assistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00337-2
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of deepfake facial manipulation technique using generative adversarial networks

Muhammad Zakarya, Ahmet Gürhanlı, Mounib Bahri, Jabar H. Yousif et al.
8 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Face recognition and analysis
10.21
article

A comparative study of deepfake facial manipulation technique using generative adversarial networks

Muhammad Zakarya, Ahmet Gürhanlı, Mounib Bahri, Jabar H. Yousif, Naveed Khan, Sanad Sulaiman Al Maskari, Wasin Al Kishri
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The manipulation of digital images has become a popular trend. Due to the development of image processing tools and visualization techniques integrating deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms (in particular generative adversarial networks–GAN), this can pose serious threats to privacy and security. In recent years, Deepfake algorithms have been designed to exchange faces or modify facial features, potentially leading to more severe problems in this context. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review of the two most important facial image processing technologies: (i) deepfake face manipulation; and (ii) face manipulation detection techniques. Furthermore, we explore the state-of-the-art of popular GAN techniques. In particular, three types of Deepfake face detection technologies are reviewed: (i) hand-crafted features (ii) artifacts; and (iii) learning-based features, while highlighting related improvements and challenges. Furthermore, this article discusses potential challenges and promising research directions for future investigation. We believe that this review has been organized to provide a structured analysis of important research papers and to discuss each study’s main findings and conclusions. Our investigation reveals shortcomings in manipulation detection benchmarks due to real-world scenario variations and biased dataset comparisons. Current research priorities revolve around enhancing GAN training stability, resolution, and manipulable facial features. Moreover, GANs have shown superior results in identifying fake images; however, their reliance prompts a systematic approach to detecting fakes. This dependency raises questions about detecting fake images with or without manipulated GAN architecture, urging the need for novel computational techniques to identify manipulations without GAN assistance.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
Arab Open University (OM), University of Ulster (GB), Sohar University (OM), Istanbul University (TR)
Ulster University, Sohar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Face recognition and analysis
10.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.