Comparative analysis on fundamental knowledge for civil engineering students in dynamics course through online engineering mechanics diagnostic test

Purpose This study evaluated the relationship between students' engineering mechanics diagnostic test results, which covered mathematics, physics and basic engineering (engineering statics) knowledge in their first year of university. Design/methodology/approach This study used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The study’s sample consisted of 305 first-year post-secondary engineering students. The trend of knowledge competency was studied by comparing the gender, entry-level and semester of the students. Findings The study’s results indicate that there is no significant difference in physics and basic engineering knowledge among male and female students. Furthermore, the findings indicate that each student from a different semester has distinct qualities or attributes in each category of questions, which are mathematics, physics and engineering statics. Originality/value The study provides compelling evidence supporting the use of diagnostic tests as a tool for assessing and predicting students' academic performance in engineering courses. It contributes to the limited body of research on the relationship between fundamental knowledge in mathematics, physics and engineering statics and student performance in engineering dynamics, underscoring the diagnostic test’s predictive validity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-05-2024-0257
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis on fundamental knowledge for civil engineering students in dynamics course through online engineering mechanics diagnostic test

Ilyani Akmar Abu Bakar, Nur Ilya Farhana Md Noh, Yazmin Sahol Hamid, Mohd Raizamzamani Md Zain et al.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Comparative analysis on fundamental knowledge for civil engineering students in dynamics course through online engineering mechanics diagnostic test

Ilyani Akmar Abu Bakar, Nur Ilya Farhana Md Noh, Yazmin Sahol Hamid, Mohd Raizamzamani Md Zain, N. Noh, Mazlina Mohamad
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluated the relationship between students' engineering mechanics diagnostic test results, which covered mathematics, physics and basic engineering (engineering statics) knowledge in their first year of university. Design/methodology/approach This study used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The study’s sample consisted of 305 first-year post-secondary engineering students. The trend of knowledge competency was studied by comparing the gender, entry-level and semester of the students. Findings The study’s results indicate that there is no significant difference in physics and basic engineering knowledge among male and female students. Furthermore, the findings indicate that each student from a different semester has distinct qualities or attributes in each category of questions, which are mathematics, physics and engineering statics. Originality/value The study provides compelling evidence supporting the use of diagnostic tests as a tool for assessing and predicting students' academic performance in engineering courses. It contributes to the limited body of research on the relationship between fundamental knowledge in mathematics, physics and engineering statics and student performance in engineering dynamics, underscoring the diagnostic test’s predictive validity.

Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.