Environmental and Management Factors Affecting Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Soils in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems: A Meta‐Analysis

Recent studies have suggested that diversified cropping systems integrating crop and livestock operations can enhance food production while reducing inputs and environmental impact. Nevertheless, the effect of integrated or mixed crop–livestock systems (MCLSs) on soil greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission, specifically nitrous oxide (N 2 O), methane (CH 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and the moderating variables influencing them have not been comprehensively examined across diverse regions and management scenarios. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis of 21 independent MCLS studies comparing soil GHG fluxes from croplands of MCLSs with fluxes from croplands within purely arable systems. Our results revealed that the primary moderating variables of GHGs emissions (CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 ) from MCLS were, in descending order of importance: drainage class, stocking density, climate, amount of N fertilizer, fertilizer type, soil texture, crop type, tillage, livestock type, and MCLS type. However, differences in CO 2 emissions within categories of stocking density, climate, crop type, livestock type, tillage, and N fertilizer amount and type were not significantly affected by MCLS. Additionally, drainage classes, stocking density, climate, soil texture, and amount and type of nitrogen (N) fertilizers emerged as the primary contributors to both N 2 O and CH 4 emissions. Maximum emissions of N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 were recorded from sand (38%), clay (33%), and sand (36%) soils, respectively. Conservation tillage (CST), sheep, cereals, and forage rotation systems were also identified as significant factors in increasing GHGs emissions. In conclusion, our meta‐analysis provides the first comprehensive assessment of the response of three major soil GHGs emissions to MCLS and demonstrates the need for further investigation into moderating variables under which MCLS can be sustainably intensified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Agriculture
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/9994696
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and Management Factors Affecting Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Soils in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems: A Meta‐Analysis

Bocar Ahamadou, Albert Berdjour, Safiétou Sanfo, Thomas Gaiser et al.
Advances in Agriculture
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
article

Environmental and Management Factors Affecting Greenhouse Gas Fluxes From Soils in Mixed Crop–Livestock Systems: A Meta‐Analysis

Bocar Ahamadou, Albert Berdjour, Safiétou Sanfo, Thomas Gaiser, Frank Ewert, Amit Kumar Srivastava
article en

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that diversified cropping systems integrating crop and livestock operations can enhance food production while reducing inputs and environmental impact. Nevertheless, the effect of integrated or mixed crop–livestock systems (MCLSs) on soil greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission, specifically nitrous oxide (N 2 O), methane (CH 4 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and the moderating variables influencing them have not been comprehensively examined across diverse regions and management scenarios. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis of 21 independent MCLS studies comparing soil GHG fluxes from croplands of MCLSs with fluxes from croplands within purely arable systems. Our results revealed that the primary moderating variables of GHGs emissions (CO 2 , N 2 O, and CH 4 ) from MCLS were, in descending order of importance: drainage class, stocking density, climate, amount of N fertilizer, fertilizer type, soil texture, crop type, tillage, livestock type, and MCLS type. However, differences in CO 2 emissions within categories of stocking density, climate, crop type, livestock type, tillage, and N fertilizer amount and type were not significantly affected by MCLS. Additionally, drainage classes, stocking density, climate, soil texture, and amount and type of nitrogen (N) fertilizers emerged as the primary contributors to both N 2 O and CH 4 emissions. Maximum emissions of N 2 O, CH 4 , and CO 2 were recorded from sand (38%), clay (33%), and sand (36%) soils, respectively. Conservation tillage (CST), sheep, cereals, and forage rotation systems were also identified as significant factors in increasing GHGs emissions. In conclusion, our meta‐analysis provides the first comprehensive assessment of the response of three major soil GHGs emissions to MCLS and demonstrates the need for further investigation into moderating variables under which MCLS can be sustainably intensified.

Advances in AgricultureVol. 2025(1)
University of Bonn (DE), Institut Polytechnique Rural de Formation et de Recherche Appliquée (ML), West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (GH), Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (ML), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, BonaRes
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.