Robotic Surgery Is a Safe Treatment in Very Elderly Patients with Resectable Lung Cancer
<b>Background:</b> Lung cancer represents a significant health concern, particularly among the elderly population. With global life expectancy increasing, the number of very elderly patients is rising. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offers potential advantages over both traditional and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RATS in very elderly patients (VEP) diagnosed with lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included patients who underwent major lung resections using RATS between 2015 and 2022 at two specialized centers. Patients were divided into very elderly patients (VEP, ≥80 years) and non-elderly patients (NEP, <80 years). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:3 ratio was performed using clinically relevant variables that were significantly different at baseline to balance the two groups. <b>Results</b>: This study included 340 patients: 28 VEP and 312 NEP. Before PSM, VEP had higher ASA scores, more advanced disease stages, and increased comorbidities. Despite these differences, postoperative outcomes were comparable. Complications occurred in 42.9% of VEP and 29.8% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.16), but grade III complications were observed in 14.3% of VEP and 6.4% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.12), and grade IV complications were observed in 0% of VEP and 0.9% of NEP (<i>p</i> = not estimable). The mean hospital stay was 4 days in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.99). Even after PSM (26 VEP vs. 71 NEP), complications, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality (3.9% in VEP, 0% in NEP) were similar. Multivariable analysis identified reduced FEV1 as a predictor of complications, while pathological stage I and lobectomy were associated with a decreased risk of complications, both before and after PSM. <b>Conclusions</b>: RATS is a safe and feasible option for selected very elderly patients with lung cancer, yielding outcomes comparable to younger patients.
Authors
- Riccardo Di Fonzo
- Veronica Maria Giudici
- Gianluca Perroni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-3214)
- Alessandra Bulotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-4813)
- Pierluigi Novellis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-3901)
- Piergiorgio Muriana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-1071)
- Elisa Dieci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9523-6651)
- Edoardo Bottoni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-5754)
- Giuseppe Marulli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-615X)
- Domenico Pontillo
- Roberto Ferrara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6443-5642)
- Giulia Veronesi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9228-6082)
Institutions
- Humanitas University (IT)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
- Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria (IT)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124314
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.04