Robotic Surgery Is a Safe Treatment in Very Elderly Patients with Resectable Lung Cancer

<b>Background:</b> Lung cancer represents a significant health concern, particularly among the elderly population. With global life expectancy increasing, the number of very elderly patients is rising. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offers potential advantages over both traditional and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RATS in very elderly patients (VEP) diagnosed with lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included patients who underwent major lung resections using RATS between 2015 and 2022 at two specialized centers. Patients were divided into very elderly patients (VEP, ≥80 years) and non-elderly patients (NEP, <80 years). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:3 ratio was performed using clinically relevant variables that were significantly different at baseline to balance the two groups. <b>Results</b>: This study included 340 patients: 28 VEP and 312 NEP. Before PSM, VEP had higher ASA scores, more advanced disease stages, and increased comorbidities. Despite these differences, postoperative outcomes were comparable. Complications occurred in 42.9% of VEP and 29.8% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.16), but grade III complications were observed in 14.3% of VEP and 6.4% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.12), and grade IV complications were observed in 0% of VEP and 0.9% of NEP (<i>p</i> = not estimable). The mean hospital stay was 4 days in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.99). Even after PSM (26 VEP vs. 71 NEP), complications, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality (3.9% in VEP, 0% in NEP) were similar. Multivariable analysis identified reduced FEV1 as a predictor of complications, while pathological stage I and lobectomy were associated with a decreased risk of complications, both before and after PSM. <b>Conclusions</b>: RATS is a safe and feasible option for selected very elderly patients with lung cancer, yielding outcomes comparable to younger patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124314
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic Surgery Is a Safe Treatment in Very Elderly Patients with Resectable Lung Cancer

Riccardo Di Fonzo, Veronica Maria Giudici, Gianluca Perroni, Alessandra Bulotta et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
article

Robotic Surgery Is a Safe Treatment in Very Elderly Patients with Resectable Lung Cancer

Riccardo Di Fonzo, Veronica Maria Giudici, Gianluca Perroni, Alessandra Bulotta, Pierluigi Novellis, Piergiorgio Muriana, Elisa Dieci, Edoardo Bottoni, Giuseppe Marulli, Domenico Pontillo, Roberto Ferrara, Giulia Veronesi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Lung cancer represents a significant health concern, particularly among the elderly population. With global life expectancy increasing, the number of very elderly patients is rising. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offers potential advantages over both traditional and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RATS in very elderly patients (VEP) diagnosed with lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included patients who underwent major lung resections using RATS between 2015 and 2022 at two specialized centers. Patients were divided into very elderly patients (VEP, ≥80 years) and non-elderly patients (NEP, <80 years). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:3 ratio was performed using clinically relevant variables that were significantly different at baseline to balance the two groups. <b>Results</b>: This study included 340 patients: 28 VEP and 312 NEP. Before PSM, VEP had higher ASA scores, more advanced disease stages, and increased comorbidities. Despite these differences, postoperative outcomes were comparable. Complications occurred in 42.9% of VEP and 29.8% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.16), but grade III complications were observed in 14.3% of VEP and 6.4% of NEP (<i>p</i> = 0.12), and grade IV complications were observed in 0% of VEP and 0.9% of NEP (<i>p</i> = not estimable). The mean hospital stay was 4 days in both groups (<i>p</i> = 0.99). Even after PSM (26 VEP vs. 71 NEP), complications, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality (3.9% in VEP, 0% in NEP) were similar. Multivariable analysis identified reduced FEV1 as a predictor of complications, while pathological stage I and lobectomy were associated with a decreased risk of complications, both before and after PSM. <b>Conclusions</b>: RATS is a safe and feasible option for selected very elderly patients with lung cancer, yielding outcomes comparable to younger patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(12)
Humanitas University (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.