Study of the Effects of Differences in Drill Pipe Materials, Drilling Fluids, and Formation Rock Types on the Drag Reduction Capacity of Hydraulic Oscillators

Hydraulic oscillators can effectively reduce the frictional resistance of the horizontal well drilling column and increase mechanical drilling speed, but the influence of geological and operational conditions on the drag reduction performance of these tools has not been fully studied, resulting in the selection of hydraulic oscillators still relying mainly on field experience. This study investigates the effects of drill string material, drilling fluid, and tool type on the drag reduction capability of tools. Friction coefficients of two commonly used drill string materials (G105 steel, S135 steel) with three common formation types (sandstone, shale, and limestone) were measured under oil-based and water-based drilling fluid infiltration conditions at different speeds of movement. The experimentally obtained friction coefficients were incorporated into a nonlinear mechanical model of the drill string equipped with a hydraulic oscillator, which was solved using the finite difference method. The results showed that the drill string materials had a limited effect on tool drag reduction capabilities, while rock type and drilling fluid type had a more significant impact. The drag reduction effect of tools in oil-based drilling fluids was better than that of water-based drilling fluids. In shale, the drag reduction effect of tools was better than that in sandstone and limestone. Increasing the amplitude enhanced the drag reduction ability of tools more than increasing the vibration frequency. Increasing the amplitude and frequency of the tool in an oil-based drilling fluid environment produced a more significant increase in drag reduction than doing the same in a water-based drilling fluid environment. These findings can provide theoretical guidance for the design of output characteristics of hydraulic vibrators and field selection of tools under different drilling conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13061918
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study of the Effects of Differences in Drill Pipe Materials, Drilling Fluids, and Formation Rock Types on the Drag Reduction Capacity of Hydraulic Oscillators

Gonghui Liu, Shichang Li, Tian Chen, Wei Wang et al.
1 citations
Processes
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.15
article

Study of the Effects of Differences in Drill Pipe Materials, Drilling Fluids, and Formation Rock Types on the Drag Reduction Capacity of Hydraulic Oscillators

Gonghui Liu, Shichang Li, Tian Chen, Wei Wang, Jun Li, Lincong Wang, Xin He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hydraulic oscillators can effectively reduce the frictional resistance of the horizontal well drilling column and increase mechanical drilling speed, but the influence of geological and operational conditions on the drag reduction performance of these tools has not been fully studied, resulting in the selection of hydraulic oscillators still relying mainly on field experience. This study investigates the effects of drill string material, drilling fluid, and tool type on the drag reduction capability of tools. Friction coefficients of two commonly used drill string materials (G105 steel, S135 steel) with three common formation types (sandstone, shale, and limestone) were measured under oil-based and water-based drilling fluid infiltration conditions at different speeds of movement. The experimentally obtained friction coefficients were incorporated into a nonlinear mechanical model of the drill string equipped with a hydraulic oscillator, which was solved using the finite difference method. The results showed that the drill string materials had a limited effect on tool drag reduction capabilities, while rock type and drilling fluid type had a more significant impact. The drag reduction effect of tools in oil-based drilling fluids was better than that of water-based drilling fluids. In shale, the drag reduction effect of tools was better than that in sandstone and limestone. Increasing the amplitude enhanced the drag reduction ability of tools more than increasing the vibration frequency. Increasing the amplitude and frequency of the tool in an oil-based drilling fluid environment produced a more significant increase in drag reduction than doing the same in a water-based drilling fluid environment. These findings can provide theoretical guidance for the design of output characteristics of hydraulic vibrators and field selection of tools under different drilling conditions.

ProcessesVol. 13(6)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, PetroChina Company Limited
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.