Using Classical Rhetoric in the Age of AI: A Study on Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman’s Study “Testing the Ability of Teachers and Students to Differentiate between Essays Generated by ChatGPT and High School Students”

This paper analyzes essay writing in AI (ChatGPT) and high school students, focusing on their use of specific details. Discussing the writing examples from Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman’s study, we employ Aristotle’s rhetorical theory to explore how clarity is achieved through specificity in writing. The analysis reveals both ChatGPT and students commonly omit detailed content, affecting clarity and argumentative strength, which affects how humans may detect AI-generated text. The paper suggests reinstating elements of classical rhetoric pedagogy in writing courses, particularly the style device of specificity. This will, we believe, not only improve student writing but also help educators to detect AI-generated text.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Athens Journal of Education
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.12-3-5
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Classical Rhetoric in the Age of AI: A Study on Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman’s Study “Testing the Ability of Teachers and Students to Differentiate between Essays Generated by ChatGPT and High School Students”

Gregory VanderPyl, Daniel R. Fredrick, Thomas Corbin
Athens Journal of Education
Topic Modeling
article

Using Classical Rhetoric in the Age of AI: A Study on Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman’s Study “Testing the Ability of Teachers and Students to Differentiate between Essays Generated by ChatGPT and High School Students”

Gregory VanderPyl, Daniel R. Fredrick, Thomas Corbin
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes essay writing in AI (ChatGPT) and high school students, focusing on their use of specific details. Discussing the writing examples from Waltzer, Cox, and Heyman’s study, we employ Aristotle’s rhetorical theory to explore how clarity is achieved through specificity in writing. The analysis reveals both ChatGPT and students commonly omit detailed content, affecting clarity and argumentative strength, which affects how humans may detect AI-generated text. The paper suggests reinstating elements of classical rhetoric pedagogy in writing courses, particularly the style device of specificity. This will, we believe, not only improve student writing but also help educators to detect AI-generated text.

Athens Journal of EducationVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.